From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B7E3BD623 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773063625; cv=none; b=dhELtv9yJSwwm53Q4H7E7/2qdh69l9zaeXe1hcxTuqVyrPel8gyqzLlSk3YvpwKaspsgIgED4X3tfu3jkM+Y9KKC+A7DkYb/fBPbflji8wCJrNAiIog8TLct8rBQZ97Yi2lgjz1J60SVaCstIUqI9ft2pvJJGJF7287Msm0ReII= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773063625; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xNVQxAsmn4tbu5qowZHIgfOuqm75eIXhw6Mk7CYLJCA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Nx+CZOMjLPmgeZfG+MjIU3vR/qmMTnaMAdOZj6oAvZVO0pV5dW2ZBCA0A3mLIM1pZLaDFiDFU+1vmNu6ZRbj7kiOZGUnLUgwoTjHkc3OXFg8yZGg5ApaiSqr1hvFgq6Mn/JBNZU9LO2uDK3s8EXHpEJUibz+ChVggEVfNBWyOrQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RNRVmgl2; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RC/mK6Xo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RNRVmgl2"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RC/mK6Xo" Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:40:18 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1773063620; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xNVQxAsmn4tbu5qowZHIgfOuqm75eIXhw6Mk7CYLJCA=; b=RNRVmgl2Vc8tB2Y+QrFzMeRYPVLDq5iXFdw/Mhba4ignSboxkYiHBOoKZbR3YfxTusWhYI e38xQ14FTlljEmN68HHgTB83lfZVn4L8otMVBNQgkjMH2O7uNBAuvntrvj0JoJ7OCJZhy0 yvN+YV07sehc1RaCn8XwVwg4clrUVCdltOIO5dqYQ7A7wVkkyPJT8JMzpsnwn1raNYpEW8 Tbg4XKegkZBbS864LqMXCZP9pjtOPcJ9J1rgqs+eIC9kMf0CLJnQ46sjkpMWsPehlv84j7 yEtLY4/rQmI2Qibev/u4BbOGSIs6hsLf8bMv8g117bGOkt+iTdRVFy2MacT3BQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1773063620; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xNVQxAsmn4tbu5qowZHIgfOuqm75eIXhw6Mk7CYLJCA=; b=RC/mK6XovFK/SMJX/vQBJtWoSPmJcU3+8a07a/3Iv/rgyml8rEUYQ+eu6QAhGu/izaPEui YG/TCwMJXNvTu3CQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, pshete@nvidia.com, Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: Patch "soc/tegra: pmc: Fix unsafe generic_handle_irq() call" has been added to the 6.19-stable tree Message-ID: <20260309134018.kstGuW4s@linutronix.de> References: <20260227025419.2745361-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20260227071216.6dYMGnMj@linutronix.de> <2026030910-strength-relapse-8dee@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <2026030910-strength-relapse-8dee@gregkh> On 2026-03-09 14:38:28 [+0100], Greg KH wrote: > > sorry for not noticing this earlier: Instead of irq_work() and all this, > > I would suggest to revert this and simply switch to > > generic_handle_irq_safe() instead. >=20 > Can you send a patch upstream for this and tag it for stable? This was meant for the developer and maintainer of the patch, not for the stable team. I will follow up if they don't respond=E2=80=A6 > thanks, >=20 > greg k-h Sebastian