From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB142438FE7; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773134512; cv=none; b=NDZ9O/vqwjQ1DDMJItumYSMVMi8CvJZDxmZ55C3uGTuCt/W3AGbohx6NHIs86I2ERYJkOFqcUdD6LpERrZAz70K9Jgs6b07HEj7NnG8TeqYs33T2LO5/jc7NprU+ojzCC4+dLuCwsMFsvEcM2NvDwi8cpgsY5wDL1HkrJItsJHY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773134512; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TjT1+p6v6zuaY5OcYbGBI4btNS2kNeaW6BC56ljUlpE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WzC+9Wa2wd8SRxs/mL7BqrA0WMirJqjNr3bnvhbTYvv7LB3Gz/C1rWu5czTUPTAaPyWnGmrkbhDpWiKipc06RN1JAIJrmyOWmJsFv+duzDOzH7Qa4I5uQE3efVaos6kmC4L1wydiQMpemLhUNSw1m+SEFA5MjEccnBAZBe3v8SA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cJa2q8qX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cJa2q8qX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DD1BC19423; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:21:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773134512; bh=TjT1+p6v6zuaY5OcYbGBI4btNS2kNeaW6BC56ljUlpE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cJa2q8qXewxeJj/xp8qMuM1Lal9Lkjd7sU80xdLA9aa50lMijmiX6Wdf7kRghNE20 5ldRTFzAQ6FP9KqGUJ5ld/lDJfMNJNMmeqwKW9gWNSua/eUJoDIzt5YOcO2xqKqYt6 gI7Qrdl7Da2v4HTPWb6mU/AjP2asLKPM7M2nSspUf1VznVK1I1nWfmWVt6n5dfVja7 BEnentzhqvjB78LWflL/Kt5iMs0ACziEvr/AHIfPJnMKmk6Zml6tqgFcjb1cQWL9An VPeQthgmHyA0zJLydvUkaG+62vbUESXDkOPouz3MXmBZ4HPWZY4cv0MMKx/8+zrNC0 eM2jOYF48hcnw== Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:21:48 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Brian Mak , Herve Codina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: core: Preserve OF node when ACPI handle is present Message-ID: <20260310092148.GE183676@google.com> References: <20260226224511.458065-1-makb@juniper.net> <20260306133806.GM183676@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, 06 Mar 2026, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 01:38:06PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2026, Brian Mak wrote: > > ... > > > > + /* > > > + * FIXME: The fwnode design doesn't allow proper stacking/sharing. This > > > > So when will this be fixed exactly? > > I don't know, it's a huge task that requires of redesigning how struct > fwnode_handle looks like and how it cohabits with struct device. Do you > you think that NOTE will be more appropriate, because it may span several > releases. If someone is going to do the work sometime in the near future, it can stay as FIXME. A few releases isn't going to offend anyone. However, if we're just going to sit on it and this is likely to be here for an elongated period, it should be changed. Any idea who is planning on working on it? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]