public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+652af2b3c5569c4ab63c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] xfs: stop reclaim before pushing AIL during unmount
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:39:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310203944.GV1105363@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310183835.89827-7-ytohnuki@amazon.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 06:38:37PM +0000, Yuto Ohnuki wrote:
> The unmount sequence in xfs_unmount_flush_inodes() pushed the AIL while
> background reclaim and inodegc are still running. This is broken
> independently of any use-after-free issues - background reclaim and
> inodegc should not be running while the AIL is being pushed during
> unmount, as inodegc can dirty and insert inodes into the AIL during the
> flush, and background reclaim can race to abort and free dirty inodes.
> 
> Reorder xfs_unmount_flush_inodes() to stop inodegc and cancel background
> reclaim before pushing the AIL. Stop inodegc before cancelling
> m_reclaim_work because the inodegc worker can re-queue m_reclaim_work
> via xfs_inodegc_set_reclaimable.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+652af2b3c5569c4ab63c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=652af2b3c5569c4ab63c
> Fixes: 90c60e164012 ("xfs: xfs_iflush() is no longer necessary")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9
> Signed-off-by: Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com>

Looks good now,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 9c295abd0a0a..ef1ea8a1238c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -608,8 +608,9 @@ xfs_unmount_check(
>   * have been retrying in the background.  This will prevent never-ending
>   * retries in AIL pushing from hanging the unmount.
>   *
> - * Finally, we can push the AIL to clean all the remaining dirty objects, then
> - * reclaim the remaining inodes that are still in memory at this point in time.
> + * Stop inodegc and background reclaim before pushing the AIL so that they
> + * are not running while the AIL is being flushed. Then push the AIL to
> + * clean all the remaining dirty objects and reclaim the remaining inodes.
>   */
>  static void
>  xfs_unmount_flush_inodes(
> @@ -621,9 +622,9 @@ xfs_unmount_flush_inodes(
>  
>  	xfs_set_unmounting(mp);
>  
> -	xfs_ail_push_all_sync(mp->m_ail);
>  	xfs_inodegc_stop(mp);
>  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mp->m_reclaim_work);
> +	xfs_ail_push_all_sync(mp->m_ail);
>  	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp);
>  	xfs_health_unmount(mp);
>  	xfs_healthmon_unmount(mp);
> -- 
> 2.50.1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, 38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B186284
> 
> Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Irish Branch, One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland, branch registration number 908705
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260310183835.89827-6-ytohnuki@amazon.com>
2026-03-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] xfs: stop reclaim before pushing AIL during unmount Yuto Ohnuki
2026-03-10 20:39   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] xfs: avoid dereferencing log items after push callbacks Yuto Ohnuki
2026-03-10 20:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] xfs: save ailp before dropping the AIL lock in " Yuto Ohnuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260310203944.GV1105363@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+652af2b3c5569c4ab63c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=ytohnuki@amazon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox