From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jimmy Hu <hhhuuu@google.com>
Cc: Dan Vacura <w36195@motorola.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: gadget: f_uvc: fix NULL pointer dereference during unbind race
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:18:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026031947-unroll-rectified-72d8@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319084640.478695-1-hhhuuu@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 04:46:40PM +0800, Jimmy Hu wrote:
> Commit b81ac4395bbe ("usb: gadget: uvc: allow for application to cleanly
> shutdown") introduced two stages of synchronization waits totaling 1500ms
> in uvc_function_unbind() to prevent several types of kernel panics.
> However, this timing-based approach is insufficient during power
> management (PM) transitions.
>
> When the PM subsystem starts freezing user space processes, the
> wait_event_interruptible_timeout() is aborted early, which allows the
> unbind thread to proceed and nullify the gadget pointer
> (cdev->gadget = NULL):
>
> [ 814.123447][ T947] configfs-gadget.g1 gadget.0: uvc: uvc_function_unbind()
> [ 814.178583][ T3173] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> [ 814.192487][ T3173] Freezing user space processes
> [ 814.197668][ T947] configfs-gadget.g1 gadget.0: uvc: uvc_function_unbind no clean disconnect, wait for release
>
> When the PM subsystem resumes or aborts the suspend and tasks are
> restarted, the V4L2 release path is executed and attempts to access the
> already nullified gadget pointer, triggering a kernel panic:
>
> [ 814.292597][ C0] PM: pm_system_irq_wakeup: 479 triggered dhdpcie_host_wake
> [ 814.386727][ T3173] Restarting tasks ...
> [ 814.403522][ T4558] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000030
> [ 814.404021][ T4558] pc : usb_gadget_deactivate+0x14/0xf4
> [ 814.404031][ T4558] lr : usb_function_deactivate+0x54/0x94
> [ 814.404078][ T4558] Call trace:
> [ 814.404080][ T4558] usb_gadget_deactivate+0x14/0xf4
> [ 814.404083][ T4558] usb_function_deactivate+0x54/0x94
> [ 814.404087][ T4558] uvc_function_disconnect+0x1c/0x5c
> [ 814.404092][ T4558] uvc_v4l2_release+0x44/0xac
> [ 814.404095][ T4558] v4l2_release+0xcc/0x130
>
> This patch fixes these issues by:
>
> 1. State Synchronization (flag + mutex)
> Introduce a 'func_unbound' flag in struct uvc_device. This allows
> uvc_function_disconnect() to safely skip accessing the nullified
> cdev->gadget pointer. As suggested by Alan Stern, this flag is protected
> by a new mutex (uvc->lock) to ensure proper memory ordering and prevent
> instruction reordering or speculative loads.
>
> 2. Explicit Synchronization (completion)
> Use a completion to synchronize uvc_function_unbind() with the
> uvc_vdev_release() callback. This prevents Use-After-Free (UAF) by
> ensuring struct uvc_device is freed after all video device resources
> are released.
>
> Fixes: b81ac4395bbe ("usb: gadget: uvc: allow for application to cleanly shutdown")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jimmy Hu <hhhuuu@google.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - Replaced pr_info() with pr_debug() instead of uvcg_info() to stay quiet
> and avoided potential NULL pointer dereferences on cdev->gadget, as
> suggested by Greg KH.
> - Replaced kref-based lifecycle management with a completion to synchronize
> uvc_function_unbind() with the video device release callback, avoiding
> redundant reference counting, as suggested by Greg KH.
> - Added a proper comment for 'lock' in struct uvc_device to describe
> what it protects, as suggested by Greg KH.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Renamed 'func_unbinding' to 'func_unbound' for clearer state semantics.
> - Added a mutex (uvc->lock) to protect the 'func_unbound' flag and ensure
> proper memory ordering, as suggested by Alan Stern.
> - Integrated kref to manage the struct uvc_device lifecycle, allowing the
> removal of redundant buffer cleanup skip logic in uvc_v4l2_disable().
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260309053107.2591494-1-hhhuuu@google.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260224083955.1375032-1-hhhuuu@google.com/
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> index 494fdbc4e85b..390156e70df9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> @@ -413,8 +413,18 @@ uvc_function_disconnect(struct uvc_device *uvc)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + mutex_lock(&uvc->lock);
> + if (uvc->func_unbound) {
> + pr_debug("%s: %s unbound, skipping function deactivate\n",
> + uvc->func.name, uvc->func.fi->group.cg_item.ci_name);
You have a pointer to many different devices in uvc, so why not use
dev_dbg() instead? At the very least, use the v4l2_device one, right?
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> if ((ret = usb_function_deactivate(&uvc->func)) < 0)
> uvcg_info(&uvc->func, "UVC disconnect failed with %d\n", ret);
> +
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&uvc->lock);
Why not just use a guard()?
> }
>
> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -431,6 +441,15 @@ static ssize_t function_name_show(struct device *dev,
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(function_name);
>
> +static void uvc_vdev_release(struct video_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct uvc_device *uvc = video_get_drvdata(vdev);
> +
> + /* Signal uvc_function_unbind() that the video device has been released */
> + if (uvc->vdev_release_done)
> + complete(uvc->vdev_release_done);
> +}
> +
> static int
> uvc_register_video(struct uvc_device *uvc)
> {
> @@ -443,7 +462,7 @@ uvc_register_video(struct uvc_device *uvc)
> uvc->vdev.v4l2_dev->dev = &cdev->gadget->dev;
> uvc->vdev.fops = &uvc_v4l2_fops;
> uvc->vdev.ioctl_ops = &uvc_v4l2_ioctl_ops;
> - uvc->vdev.release = video_device_release_empty;
> + uvc->vdev.release = uvc_vdev_release;
> uvc->vdev.vfl_dir = VFL_DIR_TX;
> uvc->vdev.lock = &uvc->video.mutex;
> uvc->vdev.device_caps = V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT | V4L2_CAP_STREAMING;
> @@ -659,6 +678,9 @@ uvc_function_bind(struct usb_configuration *c, struct usb_function *f)
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> uvcg_info(f, "%s()\n", __func__);
> + mutex_lock(&uvc->lock);
> + uvc->func_unbound = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&uvc->lock);
>
> opts = fi_to_f_uvc_opts(f->fi);
> /* Sanity check the streaming endpoint module parameters. */
> @@ -992,8 +1014,13 @@ static void uvc_function_unbind(struct usb_configuration *c,
> struct uvc_device *uvc = to_uvc(f);
> struct uvc_video *video = &uvc->video;
> long wait_ret = 1;
> + DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(vdev_release_done);
>
> uvcg_info(f, "%s()\n", __func__);
> + mutex_lock(&uvc->lock);
> + uvc->func_unbound = true;
> + uvc->vdev_release_done = &vdev_release_done;
> + mutex_unlock(&uvc->lock);
>
> kthread_cancel_work_sync(&video->hw_submit);
>
> @@ -1029,6 +1056,10 @@ static void uvc_function_unbind(struct usb_configuration *c,
> uvcg_dbg(f, "done waiting for release with ret: %ld\n", wait_ret);
> }
>
> + /* Wait for the video device to be released */
> + wait_for_completion(&vdev_release_done);
> + uvc->vdev_release_done = NULL;
> +
> usb_ep_free_request(cdev->gadget->ep0, uvc->control_req);
> kfree(uvc->control_buf);
>
> @@ -1047,6 +1078,8 @@ static struct usb_function *uvc_alloc(struct usb_function_instance *fi)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> mutex_init(&uvc->video.mutex);
> + mutex_init(&uvc->lock);
> + uvc->func_unbound = true;
> uvc->state = UVC_STATE_DISCONNECTED;
> init_waitqueue_head(&uvc->func_connected_queue);
> opts = fi_to_f_uvc_opts(fi);
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc.h
> index 676419a04976..6fa98a173a35 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ struct uvc_device {
> enum uvc_state state;
> struct usb_function func;
> struct uvc_video video;
> + struct completion *vdev_release_done;
> + struct mutex lock; /* protects func_unbound flag */
> + bool func_unbound;
A lock to only protect one flag? How are all of the other flags in this
structure protected? Why not use whatever lock is used there, OR use
this lock to protect them?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 8:46 [PATCH v3] usb: gadget: f_uvc: fix NULL pointer dereference during unbind race Jimmy Hu
2026-03-19 9:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026031947-unroll-rectified-72d8@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hhhuuu@google.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=w36195@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox