public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: <mhonap@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dmatlack@google.com>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	<ankita@nvidia.com>, <kjaju@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	alex@shazbot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: selftests: Fix VLA initialisation in vfio_pci_irq_set()
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:17:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260320151726.4db61e9f@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318145323.7e9831a4@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:53:23 -0600
Alex Williamson <alwilliamson@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:44:02 +0530
> <mhonap@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Manish Honap <mhonap@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > C does not permit an initialiser expression on a variable-length array
> > (C99 Section 6.7.9 constraint: "The type of the entity to be initialized
> > shall not be a variable length array type").
> > 
> > vfio_pci_irq_set() declared:
> > 
> >       u8 buf[sizeof(struct vfio_irq_set) + sizeof(int) * count] = {};
> > 
> > where `count` is a runtime function parameter, making `buf` a VLA.
> > 
> > GCC rejects this with (tried with GCC-9.4.0):
> > 
> >       error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
> > 
> > Fix by removing the `= {}` initialiser and inserting an explicit
> > memset() immediately after the declaration.  memset() on a VLA is
> > perfectly legal and achieves the same zero-initialisation on all
> > conforming C implementations.
> > 
> > Fixes: 19faf6fd969c ("vfio: selftests: Add a helper library for VFIO selftests")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manish Honap <mhonap@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > This fix is self-contained: it touches only the existing vfio selftest
> > helper library and carries no dependency on any other patch.  It was
> > originally included as PATCH 20/20 in the CXL Type-2 VFIO passthrough
> > RFC series [1] but belongs on the vfio list independently, as noted by
> > Dave Jiang.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260311203440.752648-1-mhonap@nvidia.com/
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> > index fac4c0ecadef..3258e814f450 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> > @@ -26,8 +26,10 @@
> >  static void vfio_pci_irq_set(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
> >  			     u32 index, u32 vector, u32 count, int *fds)
> >  {
> > -	u8 buf[sizeof(struct vfio_irq_set) + sizeof(int) * count] = {};
> > +	u8 buf[sizeof(struct vfio_irq_set) + sizeof(int) * count];
> >  	struct vfio_irq_set *irq = (void *)&buf;
> > +
> > +	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> >  	int *irq_fds = (void *)&irq->data;
> > 
> >  	irq->argsz = sizeof(buf);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >   
> 
> This unnecessarily split the declaration block.  Without objection,
> I'll commit this with the following change:
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> index d306ab81123a..fc75e04ef010 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ static void vfio_pci_irq_set(struct vfio_pci_device *device,
>  {
>         u8 buf[sizeof(struct vfio_irq_set) + sizeof(int) * count];
>         struct vfio_irq_set *irq = (void *)&buf;
> +       int *irq_fds = (void *)&irq->data;
>  
>         memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> -       int *irq_fds = (void *)&irq->data;
>  
>         irq->argsz = sizeof(buf);
>         irq->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;

Applied with this fix to vfio next branch for v7.1.  Thanks,

Alex



      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-20 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17  5:14 [PATCH] vfio: selftests: Fix VLA initialisation in vfio_pci_irq_set() mhonap
2026-03-18 20:53 ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-20 21:17   ` Alex Williamson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260320151726.4db61e9f@shazbot.org \
    --to=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhonap@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox