From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] driver core: Don't link the device to the bus until we're ready to probe
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 06:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026032152-getting-carmaker-29d5@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320200656.RFC.1.Id750b0fbcc94f23ed04b7aecabcead688d0d8c17@changeid>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 08:06:58PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The moment we link a "struct device" into the list of devices for the
> bus, it's possible probe can happen. This is because another thread
> can load the driver at any time and that can cause the device to
> probe. This has been seen in practice with a stack crawl that looks
> like this [1]:
>
> really_probe()
> __driver_probe_device()
> driver_probe_device()
> __driver_attach()
> bus_for_each_dev()
> driver_attach()
> bus_add_driver()
> driver_register()
> __platform_driver_register()
> init_module() [some module]
> do_one_initcall()
> do_init_module()
> load_module()
> __arm64_sys_finit_module()
> invoke_syscall()
Are you sure this isn't just a platform bus issue? A bus should NOT be
allowing a driver to be added at the same time a device is being added
for that bus, ideally there should be a bus-specific lock somewhere for
this.
When a device is added to the bus, yes, a probe can happen, and is
expected to happen, for that device, so this feels odd.
that being said, your patch does seem sane, and I don't see anything
obviously wrong with it. But it feels odd that this is just now showing
up for something that has been this way for a few decades...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-21 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-21 3:06 [RFC PATCH] driver core: Don't link the device to the bus until we're ready to probe Douglas Anderson
2026-03-21 5:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-03-21 7:35 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-21 7:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-21 8:05 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-21 15:54 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-23 17:07 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-23 17:47 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-23 22:24 ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-24 15:21 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-26 21:49 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026032152-getting-carmaker-29d5@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox