public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] driver core: Don't link the device to the bus until we're ready to probe
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 06:41:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026032152-getting-carmaker-29d5@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320200656.RFC.1.Id750b0fbcc94f23ed04b7aecabcead688d0d8c17@changeid>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 08:06:58PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The moment we link a "struct device" into the list of devices for the
> bus, it's possible probe can happen. This is because another thread
> can load the driver at any time and that can cause the device to
> probe. This has been seen in practice with a stack crawl that looks
> like this [1]:
> 
>   really_probe()
>   __driver_probe_device()
>   driver_probe_device()
>   __driver_attach()
>   bus_for_each_dev()
>   driver_attach()
>   bus_add_driver()
>   driver_register()
>   __platform_driver_register()
>   init_module() [some module]
>   do_one_initcall()
>   do_init_module()
>   load_module()
>   __arm64_sys_finit_module()
>   invoke_syscall()

Are you sure this isn't just a platform bus issue?  A bus should NOT be
allowing a driver to be added at the same time a device is being added
for that bus, ideally there should be a bus-specific lock somewhere for
this.

When a device is added to the bus, yes, a probe can happen, and is
expected to happen, for that device, so this feels odd.

that being said, your patch does seem sane, and I don't see anything
obviously wrong with it.  But it feels odd that this is just now showing
up for something that has been this way for a few decades...

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-21  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-21  3:06 [RFC PATCH] driver core: Don't link the device to the bus until we're ready to probe Douglas Anderson
2026-03-21  5:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-03-21  7:35   ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-21  7:42     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-21  8:05       ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-21 15:54         ` Alan Stern
2026-03-23 17:07           ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-23 17:47             ` Alan Stern
2026-03-23 22:24               ` Doug Anderson
2026-03-24 15:21                 ` Alan Stern
2026-03-26 21:49                   ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026032152-getting-carmaker-29d5@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox