From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7F61A2C0B; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774207608; cv=none; b=t8AZjvgnxZSlaEtC3RlMx/pZxiDdaRxjw3MhaWoz+ILwn/WV7zWNke2rU3U/VoNuwY4cG/icBzCsp1BLl+DQbImGSsAHYaluao9dF5c42Uq6F588YpcOnb1bSSn4rhDYmHFz1POvgcL1dwYr78iCGVUNgBRhyAhi3WbPcJ9eA70= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774207608; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X2DK8H4FcYtPiwS5iIb457FtPn7QN07ZkhbMOTso2XE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=cYCpyGQO1iJFNtPVpf3GmYFQTiDslaVIjC4tnnCznBNVp191kbw+iQLkWTCIEMaP0Iq02Npecpm15r8n2DH9Jzc8VnbErRmH9tHIzko92xA5QMNauAn0JQEcpHojX0BkywYtAzKRZPIGwgJ8zreO8LX2sGGj0wyQaGN0uJU7hBY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UiZD1+x/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UiZD1+x/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ACB1C19424; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774207608; bh=X2DK8H4FcYtPiwS5iIb457FtPn7QN07ZkhbMOTso2XE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UiZD1+x/nVOYnkRO5qYh824b+4jHHTlKk0D8ItIlwe6xN878lJgYIeLdhlrMnIT3m RMe8k6LPrBU5LA0ckrvSPYCU7l3PIE7ABUVuU9E+B7W5QfGLG/4PSrBhWsAX5RKmSz o3qrMQvaL/KvVM4jFc1ilhEmqkK7ZzoVpw4QaShx/p4G737WNesAnW8Ck33sV3FP70 r0rKJgsMjEWE+pZ82cUiiKzHemb60reqp8ODiBFS5EtojiM9tQV3ftjA00FTgxfmWI pcd2OUb9Y10IpYCrlf8IxEwu6RCjnA4fiHL5yMvuu5GOGZpNWlLDkfJqCQidVSnm+A advWRx6HtLSXw== From: SeongJae Park To: SeongJae Park Cc: Andrew Morton , "# 6 . 15 . x" , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon/core: avoid use of half-online-committed context Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 12:26:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20260322192641.87848-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260321021628.78887-1-sj@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 19:16:35 SeongJae Park wrote: [...] > By the way, I am also doing monitoring of sashiko.dev for all DAMON patches. > It will be much easier once sashiko.dev's email feature is ready, since I > already onboarded DAMON for that. > > Meanwhile, the monitoring using web browser is somewhat tedious for me, so I > just implemented an hkml feature, namely > 'hkml patch sashiko_dev --thread_status'. It receives a message id of a mail, > and prints the review status/result of all patches of the thread. > > E.g., > > $ hkml patch sashiko_dev --thread_status 20260319-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v2-v2-0-92c596402a7a@google.com > - [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] mm: memory_failure: Clarify the MF_DELAYED definition > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > - [PATCH RFC v2 2/7] mm: memory_failure: Allow truncate_error_folio to return MF_DELAYED > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > - [PATCH RFC v2 3/7] mm: shmem: Update shmem handler to the MF_DELAYED definition > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > - [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases > - Pending (None) > - [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > - [PATCH RFC v2 5/7] mm: selftests: Add shmem memory failure test > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > - [PATCH RFC v2 6/7] KVM: selftests: Add memory failure tests in guest_memfd_test > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > - [PATCH RFC v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd behavior with respect to stage 2 page tables > - Reviewed (Review completed successfully.) > > I'm planning to implement another feature for formatting and sending the review > result and inline comments as emails, probably this weekend. Now the feature is available on 'master' branch of hkml. I started using it since yesterday for DAMON patches, and it works for at least my workflow. The documentation is also updated [1]. [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail/blob/test/USAGE.md#forwarding-sashikodev-statuscomments-to-mailing-list Thanks, SJ [...]