From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Oleh Konko <security@1seal.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] nfc: llcp: fix tlv offset wrap and missing bounds checks
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 20:01:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326200133.GX111839@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463598db3dea48fc963e8431181ae68a.security@1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 09:25:41PM +0000, Oleh Konko wrote:
> nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv() and nfc_llcp_parse_connection_tlv() iterate a
> u16 tlv_array_len with a u8 offset. once cumulative TLV consumption
> crosses 255 bytes, offset wraps and the loop may continue past the
> declared TLV array bounds.
>
> both parsers also read tlv[1] before checking that a full 2-byte TLV
> header remains, and they advance by length + 2 without validating that
> the declared payload still fits in the remaining array.
>
> fix this by widening offset to u16 and by rejecting incomplete headers
> or truncated TLVs before dereferencing or advancing the cursor.
This patch seems to fix two problems. It's usually best to fix one problem
per patch, creating a patch-set with two or more patches and a cover letter
if necessary.
>
> Fixes: d646960f7986 ("NFC: Initial LLCP support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Oleh Konko <security@1seal.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oleh Konko <security@1seal.org>
This patch seems to have been sent twice in about half an hour.
Please don't do that.
Rather, please observe a pause of 24h between sending updated
revisions of a patch.
Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
> ---
> net/nfc/llcp_commands.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c b/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
> index 291f26fac..157afd62f 100644
> --- a/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
> +++ b/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ int nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv(struct nfc_llcp_local *local,
> const u8 *tlv_array, u16 tlv_array_len)
> {
> const u8 *tlv = tlv_array;
> - u8 type, length, offset = 0;
> + u8 type, length;
> + u16 offset = 0;
It seems to me that the value passed to this function by the caller,
nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(), is limited to a maximum value of 255 - 3 by
virtue of being a u8 with 3 subtracted. So I'm not sure that offset
can overflow here.
For consistency with other parts of this call-chain
it might be worth changing the type of tlv_array_len to u8.
But that would be a clean-up for net-next rather than a fix for net.
>
> pr_debug("TLV array length %d\n", tlv_array_len);
>
> @@ -201,6 +202,9 @@ int nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv(struct nfc_llcp_local *local,
> return -ENODEV;
>
> while (offset < tlv_array_len) {
> + if (tlv_array_len - offset < 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> type = tlv[0];
> length = tlv[1];
>
> @@ -227,6 +231,9 @@ int nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv(struct nfc_llcp_local *local,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (tlv_array_len - offset < (u16)length + 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> offset += length + 2;
> tlv += length + 2;
> }
> @@ -243,7 +250,8 @@ int nfc_llcp_parse_connection_tlv(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
> const u8 *tlv_array, u16 tlv_array_len)
> {
> const u8 *tlv = tlv_array;
> - u8 type, length, offset = 0;
> + u8 type, length;
> + u16 offset = 0;
In this case the callers pass skb->ken as tlv_array_len.
As skb->len is an unsigned int in theory it might overflow
the u16 used for tlv_array_len. But perhaps in practice that
doesn't occur?
In any case, if you are going to update the type of offset, then
I would just change the type of type, length and offset to unsigned int.
I don't see a value in using narrower types here.
>
> pr_debug("TLV array length %d\n", tlv_array_len);
>
> @@ -251,6 +259,9 @@ int nfc_llcp_parse_connection_tlv(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
> return -ENOTCONN;
>
> while (offset < tlv_array_len) {
> + if (tlv_array_len - offset < 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> type = tlv[0];
> length = tlv[1];
>
> @@ -270,6 +281,9 @@ int nfc_llcp_parse_connection_tlv(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (tlv_array_len - offset < (u16)length + 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> offset += length + 2;
> tlv += length + 2;
> }
> --
> 2.50.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 21:25 [PATCH net] nfc: llcp: fix tlv offset wrap and missing bounds checks Oleh Konko
2026-03-26 20:01 ` Simon Horman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-24 19:54 Oleh Konko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326200133.GX111839@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=security@1seal.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox