public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,willy@infradead.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,jack@suse.cz,hch@infradead.org,hannes@cmpxchg.org,joannelkoong@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-reinstate-unconditional-writeback-start-in-balance_dirty_pages.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:51:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327005145.EFD3EC116C6@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: reinstate unconditional writeback start in balance_dirty_pages()
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-reinstate-unconditional-writeback-start-in-balance_dirty_pages.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-reinstate-unconditional-writeback-start-in-balance_dirty_pages.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Subject: mm: reinstate unconditional writeback start in balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:51:27 -0700

Commit 64dd89ae01f2 ("mm/block/fs: remove laptop_mode") removed this
unconditional writeback start from balance_dirty_pages():

       if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(wb)))
	       wb_start_background_writeback(wb);

This logic needs to be reinstated to prevent performance regressions for
strictlimited BDIs and memcg setups.  The problem occurs because:

a) For strictlimited BDIs, throttling is calculated using per-wb
   thresholds.  The per-wb threshold can be exceeded even when the global
   dirty threshold was not exceeded (nr_dirty < gdtc->bg_thresh)

b) For memcg-based throttling, memcg uses its own dirty count /
   thresholds and can trigger throttling even when the global threshold
   isn't exceeded

Without the unconditional writeback start, IO is throttled as it waits for
dirty pages to be written back but there is no writeback running.  This
leads to severe stalls.  On fuse, buffered write performance dropped from
1400 MiB/s to 2000 KiB/s.

Reinstate the unconditional writeback start so that writeback is
guaranteed to be running whenever IO needs to be throttled.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260326215127.3857682-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Fixes: 64dd89ae01f2 ("mm/block/fs: remove laptop_mode")
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/page-writeback.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/page-writeback.c~mm-reinstate-unconditional-writeback-start-in-balance_dirty_pages
+++ a/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1858,6 +1858,27 @@ free_running:
 			break;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * Unconditionally start background writeback if it's not
+		 * already in progress. We need to do this because the global
+		 * dirty threshold check above (nr_dirty > gdtc->bg_thresh)
+		 * doesn't account for these cases:
+		 *
+		 * a) strictlimit BDIs: throttling is calculated using per-wb
+		 * thresholds. The per-wb threshold can be exceeded even when
+		 * nr_dirty < gdtc->bg_thresh
+		 *
+		 * b) memcg-based throttling: memcg uses its own dirty count and
+		 * thresholds and can trigger throttling even when global
+		 * nr_dirty < gdtc->bg_thresh
+		 *
+		 * Writeback needs to be started else the writer stalls in the
+		 * throttle loop waiting for dirty pages to be written back
+		 * while no writeback is running.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(wb)))
+			wb_start_background_writeback(wb);
+
 		mem_cgroup_flush_foreign(wb);
 
 		/*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from joannelkoong@gmail.com are

mm-reinstate-unconditional-writeback-start-in-balance_dirty_pages.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260327005145.EFD3EC116C6@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox