From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: "# 6 . 14 . x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (sashiko review) [RFC PATCH v2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race deadlock
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:15:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327021546.66441-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327004952.58266-1-sj@kernel.org>
Forwarding Sashiko review for doing discussions via mails.
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327004952.58266-1-sj@kernel.org
# start of sashiko.dev inline review
commit 36b78ee39968830aca3d375219a2cfce73d0d1d0
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race deadlock
This commit fixes a race condition between damon_call and the
kdamond_fn exit path that could result in a deadlock. It introduces a
call_controls_obsolete flag to prevent damon_call from waiting
indefinitely for a terminating thread.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260325141956.87144-1-sj@kernel.org
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3062,6 +3042,9 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
> damon_destroy_targets(ctx);
>
> kfree(ctx->regions_score_histogram);
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> + ctx->call_controls_obsolete = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
> kdamond_call(ctx, true);
> damos_walk_cancel(ctx);
Does damos_walk suffer from the same exit race regression that this patch
fixes for damon_call?
In kdamond_fn, the thread termination sequence executes damos_walk_cancel
and only later sets ctx->kdamond = NULL under the kdamond_lock.
damos_walk appears to use the same pattern as the old damon_call where it
registers ctx->walk_control, checks damon_is_running (which verifies
ctx->kdamond != NULL), and then unconditionally blocks on wait_for_completion.
If a user triggers a DAMOS walk in the exact window after damos_walk_cancel
has finished but before ctx->kdamond = NULL is executed, wouldn't damos_walk
successfully register its control and pass the damon_is_running check?
If so, it would then block indefinitely on wait_for_completion because the
cancellation phase has already passed and the thread is exiting.
Because damos_walk is invoked via state_store with the global
damon_sysfs_lock held, could this infinite wait block the entire DAMON sysfs
interface for all users on the system?
# end of sashiko.dev inline review
# review url: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260327004952.58266-1-sj@kernel.org
#
# hkml [1] generated a draft of this mail. It can be regenerated
# using below command:
#
# hkml patch sashiko_dev --for_forwarding \
# 20260327004952.58266-1-sj@kernel.org
#
# [1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 0:49 [RFC PATCH v2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race deadlock SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 2:15 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-27 2:20 ` (sashiko review) " SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 3:53 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 3:52 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260327021546.66441-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox