public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	"# 6 . 14 . x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix damos_walk() vs kdamond_fn() exit race deadlock
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:26:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327142605.4834-3-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327142605.4834-1-sj@kernel.org>

When kdamond_fn() main loop is finished, the function cancels remaining
damos_walk() request and unset the damon_ctx->kdamond so that API
callers can show the context is terminated.  damos_walk() adds the
caller's request to the queue first.  After that, it shows if the
kdamond of the damon_ctx is still running (damon_ctx->kdamond is set).
Only if the kdamond is running, damos_walk() starts waiting for the
kdamond's handling of the newly added request.

The damos_walk() requests registration and damon_ctx->kdamond unset are
protected by different mutexes, though.  Hence, damos_walk() could race
with damon_ctx->kdamond unset, and result in deadlocks.

For example, let's suppose kdamond successfully finished the
damow_walk() request cancelling.  Right after that, damos_walk() is
called for the context.  It registers the new request, and shows the
context is still running, because damon_ctx->kdamond unset is not yet
done.  Hence the damos_walk() caller starts waiting for the handling of
the request.  However, the kdamond is already on the termination steps,
so it never handles the new request.  As a result, the damos_walk()
caller thread infinitely waits.

Fix this by introducing another damon_ctx field, namely
walk_control_obsolete.  It is protected by the
damon_ctx->walk_control_lock, which protects damos_walk() request
registration.  Initialize (unset) it in kdamond_fn() before letting
damon_start() returns and set it just before the cancelling of the
remaining damos_walk() request is executed.  damos_walk() reads the
obsolete field under the lock and avoids adding a new request.

After this change, only requests that are guaranteed to be handled or
cancelled are registered.  Hence the after-registration DAMON context
termination check is no longer needed.  Remove it together.

The issue is found by sashiko [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260325141956.87144-1-sj@kernel.org

Fixes: bf0eaba0ff9c ("mm/damon/core: implement damos_walk()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14.x
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/damon.h |  1 +
 mm/damon/core.c       | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
index 5129de70e7b7..f2cdb7c3f5e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/damon.h
+++ b/include/linux/damon.h
@@ -822,6 +822,7 @@ struct damon_ctx {
 	struct mutex call_controls_lock;
 
 	struct damos_walk_control *walk_control;
+	bool walk_control_obsolete;
 	struct mutex walk_control_lock;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index 9bcda2765ac9..ddabb93f2377 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -1637,6 +1637,10 @@ int damon_call(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_call_control *control)
  * passed at least one &damos->apply_interval_us, kdamond marks the request as
  * completed so that damos_walk() can wakeup and return.
  *
+ * Note that this function should be called only after damon_start() with the
+ * @ctx has succeeded.  Otherwise, this function could fall into an indefinite
+ * wait.
+ *
  * Return: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
  */
 int damos_walk(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damos_walk_control *control)
@@ -1644,19 +1648,16 @@ int damos_walk(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damos_walk_control *control)
 	init_completion(&control->completion);
 	control->canceled = false;
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
+	if (ctx->walk_control_obsolete) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
+		return -ECANCELED;
+	}
 	if (ctx->walk_control) {
 		mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 	ctx->walk_control = control;
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
-	if (!damon_is_running(ctx)) {
-		mutex_lock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
-		if (ctx->walk_control == control)
-			ctx->walk_control = NULL;
-		mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
 	wait_for_completion(&control->completion);
 	if (control->canceled)
 		return -ECANCELED;
@@ -2932,6 +2933,9 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
 	ctx->call_controls_obsolete = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
+	ctx->walk_control_obsolete = false;
+	mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
 	complete(&ctx->kdamond_started);
 	kdamond_init_ctx(ctx);
 
@@ -3046,6 +3050,9 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data)
 	ctx->call_controls_obsolete = true;
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
 	kdamond_call(ctx, true);
+	mutex_lock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
+	ctx->walk_control_obsolete = true;
+	mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
 	damos_walk_cancel(ctx);
 
 	pr_debug("kdamond (%d) finishes\n", current->pid);
-- 
2.47.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-27 14:26 [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call()/damos_walk() vs kdmond exit race SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 14:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call() vs kdamond_fn() exit race deadlock SeongJae Park
2026-03-27 14:26 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-03-27 22:57 ` (sashiko status) [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix damon_call()/damos_walk() vs kdmond exit race SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260327142605.4834-3-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox