From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sebastian Josue Alba Vives <sebasjosue84@gmail.com>
Cc: marvin24@gmx.de, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: nvec: validate battery response length before memcpy
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:51:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026033041-elf-coach-5fae@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330125200.820693-1-sebasjosue84@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 06:52:00AM -0600, Sebastian Josue Alba Vives wrote:
> From: Sebastián Alba Vives <sebasjosue84@gmail.com>
>
> In nvec_power_notifier(), the response length from the embedded
> controller is used directly as the size argument to memcpy() when
> copying battery manufacturer, model, and type strings. The
> destination buffers (bat_manu, bat_model, bat_type) are fixed at
> 30 bytes, but res->length is a u8 that can be up to 255, allowing
> a heap buffer overflow.
How can the embedded controller send data that is not correct? It is
trusted, right?
> Additionally, if res->length is less than 2, the subtraction
> res->length - 2 wraps around as an unsigned value, resulting in a
> large copy that corrupts kernel heap memory.
>
> Introduce NVEC_BAT_STRING_SIZE to replace the hardcoded buffer
> size, store res->length - 2 in a local copy_len variable for
> clarity, and add bounds checks before each memcpy to ensure the
> copy length does not exceed the destination buffer and that
> res->length is at least 2 to prevent unsigned integer underflow.
Is this the only data that needs to be validated from the controller?
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
The kernel test robot did not report these buffer size issues :(
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 12:52 [PATCH v3] staging: nvec: validate battery response length before memcpy Sebastian Josue Alba Vives
2026-03-30 15:51 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026033041-elf-coach-5fae@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=marvin24@gmx.de \
--cc=sebasjosue84@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox