public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
@ 2026-03-30 11:05 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2026-03-30 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tytso, jack, libaokun; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x bb81702370fad22c06ca12b6e1648754dbc37e0f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026033045-backlands-hunk-0977@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From bb81702370fad22c06ca12b6e1648754dbc37e0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:58:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for
 indirect mapped blocks

Commit 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups
inode can use") restricts what blocks will be allocated for indirect
block based files to block numbers that fit within 32-bit block
numbers.

However, when using a review bot running on the latest Gemini LLM to
check this commit when backporting into an LTS based kernel, it raised
this concern:

   If ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group is >= ngroups (for instance, if the goal
   group was populated via stream allocation from s_mb_last_groups),
   then start will be >= ngroups.

   Does this allow allocating blocks beyond the 32-bit limit for
   indirect block mapped files? The commit message mentions that
   ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select unsupported
   groups. However, its loop uses group = *start, and the very first
   iteration will call ext4_mb_scan_group() with this unsupported
   group because next_linear_group() is only called at the end of the
   iteration.

After reviewing the code paths involved and considering the LLM
review, I determined that this can happen when there is a file system
where some files/directories are extent-mapped and others are
indirect-block mapped.  To address this, add a safety clamp in
ext4_mb_scan_groups().

Fixes: 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode can use")
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260326045834.1175822-1-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index bb6faebf9b6d..cb2bd87c355c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1199,6 +1199,8 @@ static int ext4_mb_scan_groups(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 
 	/* searching for the right group start from the goal value specified */
 	start = ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group;
+	if (start >= ngroups)
+		start = 0;
 	ac->ac_prefetch_grp = start;
 	ac->ac_prefetch_nr = 0;
 


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-03-30 11:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-30 11:05 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox