From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 581D8271443 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774959408; cv=none; b=UiKgK2JFiu70fMTH5rVskdGK+XBy9fgvhOgQdb3IweIc7YDs5i27Q8AUY8h8FT1FAq6Zgfnwpauqaom6II0L6gjE8rTJp7JF3OReqLxoA4ycw7663vuXjkIZi4qP0EZxpQJKNMPetY/P2WCYzQElMDWF15tDmZiQz8DoQb/WDxQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774959408; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wMG/Y7nPki3jsejuV3YYjX4QMoEufsehSbY/lI9alSo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=he/u+p4AFf/aTMCXe1tJhUL5oCU0tmg2n+ZQCKUWZ6THZqzPSd5WsVgpXchnTnTGjs6u4ReRg+cA5dIaJ+K5JQH4uV7VXwcTH/tdBig9PvuGWN6f97epMvxsYu0KRpLdDRo4Icwnqw9gUQRnFT8RltCEM6YXGI3DJ4Og7feWtEA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=I5EdhRWF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="I5EdhRWF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AA2EC19423; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:16:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774959408; bh=wMG/Y7nPki3jsejuV3YYjX4QMoEufsehSbY/lI9alSo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I5EdhRWFgu1nyW3elnhfuApeC2Mv6HxO2GOFlD01F8J7mJ3lmfMreG+IE9g5RmJt/ ypBpupNU7Lro1QBFUL13MVxf8Ybqc9VSzl6B818gWqFfK1r5/AXh9V51t5uh2P/WN+ nFM/BbYDoCddb4iyyGkZpXZm+x2LkenD99WiR0qmBsyDWoO9aE4uPdEyExqXuVz8HS Ax/fAj8msbIa4MTHpB4X5gCe9JPhHHibBv9cBQPbAUx9yj/CI0YefSIDIlSFBZcmvI 66MYhPAdtuwoy1xM8yqiJqe3nzrCQ5tCD4cOAOrzDTiWt3ve5cgcXODJrOFgxSvv+7 RN2DGX2y911Xw== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jinjiang Tu , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" , Barry Song , Kefeng Wang , Liam Howlett , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Nanyong Sun , Ryan Roberts , Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/huge_memory: fix folio isn't locked in softleaf_to_folio() Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:16:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20260331121644.2195769-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <2026033038-rejoicing-dart-be64@gregkh> References: <2026033038-rejoicing-dart-be64@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jinjiang Tu [ Upstream commit 4c5e7f0fcd592801c9cc18f29f80fbee84eb8669 ] On arm64 server, we found folio that get from migration entry isn't locked in softleaf_to_folio(). This issue triggers when mTHP splitting and zap_nonpresent_ptes() races, and the root cause is lack of memory barrier in softleaf_to_folio(). The race is as follows: CPU0 CPU1 deferred_split_scan() zap_nonpresent_ptes() lock folio split_folio() unmap_folio() change ptes to migration entries __split_folio_to_order() softleaf_to_folio() set flags(including PG_locked) for tail pages folio = pfn_folio(softleaf_to_pfn(entry)) smp_wmb() VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio)) prep_compound_page() for tail pages In __split_folio_to_order(), smp_wmb() guarantees page flags of tail pages are visible before the tail page becomes non-compound. smp_wmb() should be paired with smp_rmb() in softleaf_to_folio(), which is missed. As a result, if zap_nonpresent_ptes() accesses migration entry that stores tail pfn, softleaf_to_folio() may see the updated compound_head of tail page before page->flags. This issue will trigger VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in pfn_swap_entry_folio() because of the race between folio split and zap_nonpresent_ptes() leading to a folio incorrectly undergoing modification without a folio lock being held. This is a BUG_ON() before commit 93976a20345b ("mm: eliminate further swapops predicates"), which in merged in v6.19-rc1. To fix it, add missing smp_rmb() if the softleaf entry is migration entry in softleaf_to_folio() and softleaf_to_page(). [tujinjiang@huawei.com: update function name and comments] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260321075214.3305564-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260319012541.4158561-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com Fixes: e9b61f19858a ("thp: reintroduce split_huge_page()") Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) Cc: Barry Song Cc: Kefeng Wang Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nanyong Sun Cc: Ryan Roberts Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [ adapted fix from leafops.h softleaf_to_page()/softleaf_to_folio() ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/linux/swapops.h | 20 +++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swapops.h b/include/linux/swapops.h index 1f59f9edcc241..7de89a03b72e7 100644 --- a/include/linux/swapops.h +++ b/include/linux/swapops.h @@ -541,11 +541,21 @@ static inline struct page *pfn_swap_entry_to_page(swp_entry_t entry) { struct page *p = pfn_to_page(swp_offset_pfn(entry)); - /* - * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the - * corresponding page is locked - */ - BUG_ON(is_migration_entry(entry) && !PageLocked(p)); + if (is_migration_entry(entry)) { + /* + * Ensure we do not race with split, which might alter tail + * pages into new folios and thus result in observing an + * unlocked folio. + * This matches the write barrier in __split_folio_to_order(). + */ + smp_rmb(); + + /* + * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the + * corresponding page is locked + */ + BUG_ON(!PageLocked(p)); + } return p; } -- 2.53.0