From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Xuerui Wang <kernel@xen0n.name>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 6.6] LoongArch: vDSO: Emit GNU_EH_FRAME correctly
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:10:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026033148-expletive-many-cd82@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330100133.3955364-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 06:01:33PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
>
> commit e4878c37f6679fdea91b27a0f4e60a871f0b7bad upstream.
>
> With -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables and --no-eh-frame-hdr (the default
> of the linker), the GNU_EH_FRAME segment (specified by vdso.lds.S) is
> empty. This is not valid, as the current DWARF specification mandates
> the first byte of the EH frame to be the version number 1. It causes
> some unwinders to complain, for example the ClickHouse query profiler
> spams the log with messages:
>
> clickhouse-server[365854]: libunwind: unsupported .eh_frame_hdr
> version: 127 at 7ffffffb0000
>
> Here "127" is just the byte located at the p_vaddr (0, i.e. the
> beginning of the vDSO) of the empty GNU_EH_FRAME segment. Cross-
> checking with /proc/365854/maps has also proven 7ffffffb0000 is the
> start of vDSO in the process VM image.
>
> In LoongArch the -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables option seems just a
> MIPS legacy, and MIPS only uses this option to satisfy the MIPS-specific
> "genvdso" program, per the commit cfd75c2db17e ("MIPS: VDSO: Explicitly
> use -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"). IIRC it indicates some inherent
> limitation of the MIPS ELF ABI and has nothing to do with LoongArch. So
> we can simply flip it over to -fasynchronous-unwind-tables and pass
> --eh-frame-hdr for linking the vDSO, allowing the profilers to unwind the
> stack for statistics even if the sample point is taken when the PC is in
> the vDSO.
>
> However simply adjusting the options above would exploit an issue: when
> the libgcc unwinder saw the invalid GNU_EH_FRAME segment, it silently
> falled back to a machine-specific routine to match the code pattern of
> rt_sigreturn() and extract the registers saved in the sigframe if the
> code pattern is matched. As unwinding from signal handlers is vital for
> libgcc to support pthread cancellation etc., the fall-back routine had
> been silently keeping the LoongArch Linux systems functioning since
> Linux 5.19. But when we start to emit GNU_EH_FRAME with the correct
> format, fall-back routine will no longer be used and libgcc will fail
> to unwind the sigframe, and unwinding from signal handlers will no
> longer work, causing dozens of glibc test failures. To make it possible
> to unwind from signal handlers again, it's necessary to code the unwind
> info in __vdso_rt_sigreturn via .cfi_* directives.
>
> The offsets in the .cfi_* directives depend on the layout of struct
> sigframe, notably the offset of sigcontext in the sigframe. To use the
> offset in the assembly file, factor out struct sigframe into a header to
> allow asm-offsets.c to output the offset for assembly.
>
> To work around a long-term issue in the libgcc unwinder (the pc is
> unconditionally substracted by 1: doing so is technically incorrect for
> a signal frame), a nop instruction is included with the two real
> instructions in __vdso_rt_sigreturn in the same FDE PC range. The same
> hack has been used on x86 for a long time.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: c6b99bed6b8f ("LoongArch: Add VDSO and VSYSCALL support")
> Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> ---
Does not apply cleanly on the latest 6.12.y queue :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 10:01 [PATCH for 6.6] LoongArch: vDSO: Emit GNU_EH_FRAME correctly Huacai Chen
2026-03-31 11:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-03-31 11:58 ` Xi Ruoyao
2026-03-31 12:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-31 16:34 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] " Xi Ruoyao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026033148-expletive-many-cd82@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox