From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com,
gourry@gourry.net, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kartikey406@gmail.com,
syzbot+a7067a757858ac8eb085@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable 1/1] mm: fix deferred split queue races during migration
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 09:28:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260401162855.146945-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401131032.13011-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 21:10:32 +0800 Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
> migrate_folio_move() records the deferred split queue state from src and
> replays it on dst. Replaying it after remove_migration_ptes(src, dst, 0)
> makes dst visible before it is requeued, so a concurrent rmap-removal path
> can mark dst partially mapped and trip the WARN in deferred_split_folio().
>
> Move the requeue before remove_migration_ptes() so dst is back on the
> deferred split queue before it becomes visible again.
>
> Because migration still holds dst locked at that point, teach
> deferred_split_scan() to requeue a folio when folio_trylock() fails.
> Otherwise a fully mapped underused folio can be dequeued by the shrinker
> and silently lost from split_queue.
>
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a7067a757858ac8eb085
> Fixes: 8a8ca142a488 ("mm: migrate: requeue destination folio on deferred split queue")
> Reported-by: syzbot+a7067a757858ac8eb085@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/69ccb65b.050a0220.183828.003a.GAE@google.com/
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> ---
>
> [ Backport note ]
> This patch is a follow-up fix for 8a8ca142a488 ("mm: migrate: requeue
> destination folio on deferred split queue"), which is currently only in
> mm-stable, and should be backported together with it.
>
> Credit for this fix goes to David, thanks!
>
> mm/huge_memory.c | 12 +++++++-----
> mm/migrate.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for the fix! And sorry for introducing the bug in
migrate_folio_move() :)
So I am happy with the migrate_folio_move() change, it makes sense.
The goto next if folio is locked in deferred_split_scan() was actually
on purpose. The reasoning was that if the folio is locked, we consider
it as in use by someone and therefore we shouldnt split it. Eventhough
thp_underused() does a zero-filled check, the whole point of the shrinker
was to split THPs that are "not in use", and in my mind, locked folio
is a folio in use. So not sure about that change..
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index ff9a42abd1b6..ac6d823e351f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -4558,7 +4558,7 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> goto next;
> }
> if (!folio_trylock(folio))
> - goto next;
> + goto requeue;
> if (!split_folio(folio)) {
> did_split = true;
> if (underused)
> @@ -4569,11 +4569,13 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> next:
> if (did_split || !folio_test_partially_mapped(folio))
> continue;
> +requeue:
> /*
> - * Only add back to the queue if folio is partially mapped.
> - * If thp_underused returns false, or if split_folio fails
> - * in the case it was underused, then consider it used and
> - * don't add it back to split_queue.
> + * Add back partially mapped folios, or underused folios
> + * that we could not lock this round. If thp_underused()
> + * returns false, or if split_folio() succeeds, or if
> + * split_folio() fails in the case it was underused, then
> + * consider it used and don't add it back to split_queue.
> */
> fqueue = folio_split_queue_lock_irqsave(folio, &flags);
> if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 05cb408846f2..8a64291ab5b4 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1385,6 +1385,15 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> + /*
> + * Requeue the destination folio on the deferred split queue if
> + * the source was on the queue. The source is unqueued in
> + * __folio_migrate_mapping(), so we recorded the state from
> + * before move_to_new_folio().
> + */
> + if (src_deferred_split)
> + deferred_split_folio(dst, src_partially_mapped);
> +
> /*
> * When successful, push dst to LRU immediately: so that if it
> * turns out to be an mlocked page, remove_migration_ptes() will
> @@ -1401,15 +1410,6 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
> if (old_page_state & PAGE_WAS_MAPPED)
> remove_migration_ptes(src, dst, 0);
>
> - /*
> - * Requeue the destination folio on the deferred split queue if
> - * the source was on the queue. The source is unqueued in
> - * __folio_migrate_mapping(), so we recorded the state from
> - * before move_to_new_folio().
> - */
> - if (src_deferred_split)
> - deferred_split_folio(dst, src_partially_mapped);
> -
> out_unlock_both:
> folio_unlock(dst);
> folio_set_owner_migrate_reason(dst, reason);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 13:10 [PATCH mm-unstable 1/1] mm: fix deferred split queue races during migration Lance Yang
2026-04-01 16:28 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-04-01 18:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 18:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 19:21 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-01 22:55 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-01 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-03 4:24 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-01 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260401162855.146945-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+a7067a757858ac8eb085@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox