From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BAF833BBBD for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 06:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775283818; cv=none; b=a7NyaH2rEr0EO2fkK2vWUoE1GbDPvW4LG5CR1wM7HgNbu5O5UCUcNhRBNubFlQYv5SVZUyxoYj2ruYyG9h8r8eQoinYuRIt/zFvXvpkOY1Eorl1iplLs8OAijWLowXK6wHOdFAEgtz/KJ2pgwWX/v1pQqDu5lnbMSlMq8lDl7oA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775283818; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YSj2qHQY3WBof2/tFluKj6QbWdaWSnkUwZL14Sfck5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kMXVWmpXA26wec2EMiVzaWdoBtnCrFZz/FXEgA0a2g933vL6lbMgkXG03/BO7dw86aPCum402dIUqzZDAUEqLGIIrk4BYoGxD6YB1y0xc5PzsBvnuetVOkL9EBv648tqR4PyF9+0PRv8ybl/LHWOXKaF/2KXlBi+9h9HF1Ta9TA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=zLjl078Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="zLjl078Z" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39BADC19423; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 06:23:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1775283817; bh=YSj2qHQY3WBof2/tFluKj6QbWdaWSnkUwZL14Sfck5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=zLjl078ZKEeZywSVvBlp6zuvccGJJk6/YbobJr36/CpaMK47Mz4dY9OUg+8jaKNny IaM52zj1M1L1smMG4CNlGb24wzkAn+h4o7YcLHR8DxD2abwq8SPM9gHIH5H0723cxa 3D1zqhW+TWZfWPelUwQpZ8aa2i63mN2IBbnWzrFM= Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 08:23:34 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Paul Chaignon Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Eduard Zingerman , Alexei Starovoitov , Shung-Hsi Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.6 0/6] bpf: Fix bounds when ranges cross sign boundary Message-ID: <2026040428-request-coastline-6a99@gregkh> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Paul Chaignon wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 05:33:59PM +0200, Paul Chaignon wrote: > > As discussed in [1] yesterday, this series backports two sets of fixes > > for BPF, with their selftests: > > - 00bf8d0c6c9b ("bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary") > > - 26e5e346a52c ("selftests/bpf: Test cross-sign 64bits range > > refinement") > > - f96841bbf4a1 ("selftests/bpf: Test invariants on JSLT crossing sign") > > - 5dbb19b16ac4 ("bpf: Add third round of bounds deduction") > > - fbc7aef517d8 ("bpf: Fix u32/s32 bounds when ranges cross min/max > > boundary") > > - f81fdfd16771 ("selftests/bpf: test refining u32/s32 bounds when > > ranges cross min/max boundary") > > > > Using Shung-Hsi's stable CI repo [2], I verified the BPF selftests pass > > with these commits applied on top of v6.12. > > As hinted here, the subject prefix is incorrect. This series is meant > for v6.12, not v6.6. Should I resend? Yes please!