From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] virtio_net: clamp rss_max_key_size to NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:33:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408103237-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adZlDssL48EBKzON@laps>
On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 10:20:50AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 10:15:48AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 09:54:33AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 09:43:51AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > > From: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > [ Upstream commit b4e5f04c58a29c499faa85d12952ca9a4faf1cb9 ]
> > > > >
> > > > > rss_max_key_size in the virtio spec is the maximum key size supported by
> > > > > the device, not a mandatory size the driver must use. Also the value 40
> > > > > is a spec minimum, not a spec maximum.
> > > > >
> > > > > The current code rejects RSS and can fail probe when the device reports a
> > > > > larger rss_max_key_size than the driver buffer limit. Instead, clamp the
> > > > > effective key length to min(device rss_max_key_size, NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN)
> > > > > and keep RSS enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > This keeps probe working on devices that advertise larger maximum key sizes
> > > > > while respecting the netdev RSS key buffer size limit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 3f7d9c1964fc ("virtio_net: Add hash_key_length check")
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > > > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260326142344.1171317-1-schalla@marvell.com
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > > > > [ changed clamp target from NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN to VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE ]
> > > >
> > > > Does this not make the subject and the commit log misleading?
> > >
> > > Probably, but changing the commit subject will just create more confusion.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sasha
> >
> > It's not just the subject. The commit log says:
> >
> > Also the value 40 is a spec minimum, not a spec maximum.
> >
> > but the changed patch seems to treat it as a maximum:
> >
> > + vi->rss_key_size = min_t(u16, key_sz, VIRTIO_NET_RSS_MAX_KEY_SIZE);
> >
> >
> > so unless I misread the code, the value is never > 40.
>
> I tried to explain it here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/adZitVex9UGVyH-V@laps/
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
OK let us take the discussion there.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 6:59 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio_net: clamp rss_max_key_size to NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-04-08 13:43 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] virtio_net: clamp rss_max_key_size to NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN Sasha Levin
2026-04-08 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-08 14:15 ` Sasha Levin
2026-04-08 14:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-08 14:24 ` Sasha Levin
2026-04-08 14:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408103237-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox