FAILED: patch "[PATCH] s390/cpum_sf: Cap sampling rate to prevent lsctl exception" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] s390/cpum_sf: Cap sampling rate to prevent lsctl exception" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 57ad0d4a00f5d3e80f33ba2da8d560c73d83dc22
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026040840-running-plethora-7f54@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 57ad0d4a00f5d3e80f33ba2da8d560c73d83dc22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 13:50:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390/cpum_sf: Cap sampling rate to prevent lsctl exception

commit fcc43a7e294f ("s390/configs: Set HZ=1000") changed the interrupt
frequency of the system. On machines with heavy load and many perf event
overflows, this might lead to an exception. Dmesg displays these entries:
  [112.242542] cpum_sf: Loading sampling controls failed: op 1 err -22
One line per CPU online.

The root cause is the CPU Measurement sampling facility overflow
adjustment. Whenever an overflow (too much samples per tick) occurs, the
sampling rate is adjusted and increased. This was done without observing
the maximum sampling rate limit. When the current sampling interval is
higher than the maximum sampling rate limit, the lsctl instruction raises
an exception. The error messages is the result of such an exception.
Observe the upper limit when the new sampling rate is recalculated.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 39d4a501a9ef ("s390/cpum_sf: Adjust sampling interval to avoid hitting sample limits")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
index c92c29de725e..7bfeb5208177 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
@@ -1168,6 +1168,7 @@ static void hw_collect_samples(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long *sdbt,
 static void hw_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event, int flush_all)
 {
 	unsigned long long event_overflow, sampl_overflow, num_sdb;
+	struct cpu_hw_sf *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_sf);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	union hws_trailer_header prev, new;
 	struct hws_trailer_entry *te;
@@ -1247,8 +1248,11 @@ static void hw_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event, int flush_all)
 	 * are dropped.
 	 * Slightly increase the interval to avoid hitting this limit.
 	 */
-	if (event_overflow)
+	if (event_overflow) {
 		SAMPL_RATE(hwc) += DIV_ROUND_UP(SAMPL_RATE(hwc), 10);
+		if (SAMPL_RATE(hwc) > cpuhw->qsi.max_sampl_rate)
+			SAMPL_RATE(hwc) = cpuhw->qsi.max_sampl_rate;
+	}
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long aux_sdb_index(struct aux_buffer *aux,

[PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] s390/perf_cpum_sf: Convert to use try_cmpxchg128()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit e449399ffd295a1202b74a258227193454ef333f ]

Convert cmpxchg128() usages to try_cmpxchg128() in order to generate
slightly better code.

Reviewed-by: Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 57ad0d4a00f5 ("s390/cpum_sf: Cap sampling rate to prevent lsctl exception")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
index 23a2a49547b7a..62247f20c2163 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
@@ -1188,8 +1188,8 @@ static void hw_collect_samples(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long *sdbt,
 static void hw_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event, int flush_all)
 {
 	unsigned long long event_overflow, sampl_overflow, num_sdb;
-	union hws_trailer_header old, prev, new;
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+	union hws_trailer_header prev, new;
 	struct hws_trailer_entry *te;
 	unsigned long *sdbt, sdb;
 	int done;
@@ -1233,13 +1233,11 @@ static void hw_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event, int flush_all)
 		/* Reset trailer (using compare-double-and-swap) */
 		prev.val = READ_ONCE_ALIGNED_128(te->header.val);
 		do {
-			old.val = prev.val;
 			new.val = prev.val;
 			new.f = 0;
 			new.a = 1;
 			new.overflow = 0;
-			prev.val = cmpxchg128(&te->header.val, old.val, new.val);
-		} while (prev.val != old.val);
+		} while (!try_cmpxchg128(&te->header.val, &prev.val, new.val));
 
 		/* Advance to next sample-data-block */
 		sdbt++;
@@ -1405,16 +1403,15 @@ static int aux_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 static bool aux_set_alert(struct aux_buffer *aux, unsigned long alert_index,
 			  unsigned long long *overflow)
 {
-	union hws_trailer_header old, prev, new;
+	union hws_trailer_header prev, new;
 	struct hws_trailer_entry *te;
 
 	te = aux_sdb_trailer(aux, alert_index);
 	prev.val = READ_ONCE_ALIGNED_128(te->header.val);
 	do {
-		old.val = prev.val;
 		new.val = prev.val;
-		*overflow = old.overflow;
-		if (old.f) {
+		*overflow = prev.overflow;
+		if (prev.f) {
 			/*
 			 * SDB is already set by hardware.
 			 * Abort and try to set somewhere
@@ -1424,8 +1421,7 @@ static bool aux_set_alert(struct aux_buffer *aux, unsigned long alert_index,
 		}
 		new.a = 1;
 		new.overflow = 0;
-		prev.val = cmpxchg128(&te->header.val, old.val, new.val);
-	} while (prev.val != old.val);
+	} while (!try_cmpxchg128(&te->header.val, &prev.val, new.val));
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1454,7 +1450,7 @@ static bool aux_set_alert(struct aux_buffer *aux, unsigned long alert_index,
 static bool aux_reset_buffer(struct aux_buffer *aux, unsigned long range,
 			     unsigned long long *overflow)
 {
-	union hws_trailer_header old, prev, new;
+	union hws_trailer_header prev, new;
 	unsigned long i, range_scan, idx;
 	unsigned long long orig_overflow;
 	struct hws_trailer_entry *te;
@@ -1486,17 +1482,15 @@ static bool aux_reset_buffer(struct aux_buffer *aux, unsigned long range,
 		te = aux_sdb_trailer(aux, idx);
 		prev.val = READ_ONCE_ALIGNED_128(te->header.val);
 		do {
-			old.val = prev.val;
 			new.val = prev.val;
-			orig_overflow = old.overflow;
+			orig_overflow = prev.overflow;
 			new.f = 0;
 			new.overflow = 0;
 			if (idx == aux->alert_mark)
 				new.a = 1;
 			else
 				new.a = 0;
-			prev.val = cmpxchg128(&te->header.val, old.val, new.val);
-		} while (prev.val != old.val);
+		} while (!try_cmpxchg128(&te->header.val, &prev.val, new.val));
 		*overflow += orig_overflow;
 	}
 
-- 
2.53.0

[PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] s390/cpum_sf: Cap sampling rate to prevent lsctl exception

[Sasha Levin]

From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 57ad0d4a00f5d3e80f33ba2da8d560c73d83dc22 ]

commit fcc43a7e294f ("s390/configs: Set HZ=1000") changed the interrupt
frequency of the system. On machines with heavy load and many perf event
overflows, this might lead to an exception. Dmesg displays these entries:
  [112.242542] cpum_sf: Loading sampling controls failed: op 1 err -22
One line per CPU online.

The root cause is the CPU Measurement sampling facility overflow
adjustment. Whenever an overflow (too much samples per tick) occurs, the
sampling rate is adjusted and increased. This was done without observing
the maximum sampling rate limit. When the current sampling interval is
higher than the maximum sampling rate limit, the lsctl instruction raises
an exception. The error messages is the result of such an exception.
Observe the upper limit when the new sampling rate is recalculated.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 39d4a501a9ef ("s390/cpum_sf: Adjust sampling interval to avoid hitting sample limits")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
index 62247f20c2163..7d639b7ddc08b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
@@ -1188,6 +1188,7 @@ static void hw_collect_samples(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long *sdbt,
 static void hw_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event, int flush_all)
 {
 	unsigned long long event_overflow, sampl_overflow, num_sdb;
+	struct cpu_hw_sf *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_sf);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	union hws_trailer_header prev, new;
 	struct hws_trailer_entry *te;
@@ -1267,8 +1268,11 @@ static void hw_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event, int flush_all)
 	 * are dropped.
 	 * Slightly increase the interval to avoid hitting this limit.
 	 */
-	if (event_overflow)
+	if (event_overflow) {
 		SAMPL_RATE(hwc) += DIV_ROUND_UP(SAMPL_RATE(hwc), 10);
+		if (SAMPL_RATE(hwc) > cpuhw->qsi.max_sampl_rate)
+			SAMPL_RATE(hwc) = cpuhw->qsi.max_sampl_rate;
+	}
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long aux_sdb_index(struct aux_buffer *aux,
-- 
2.53.0