* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree @ 2026-04-12 5:16 gregkh 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf() Sasha Levin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: gregkh @ 2026-04-12 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, bird, johannes.berg, johannes, stable, tomapufckgml, yifanwucs, yuantan098 Cc: stable The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ea245d78dec594372e27d8c79616baf49e98a4a1 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026041215-clamp-serpent-1558@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From ea245d78dec594372e27d8c79616baf49e98a4a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:14:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created Userspace can create an unlimited number of rfkill events if the system is so configured, while not consuming them from the rfkill file descriptor, causing a potential out of memory situation. Prevent this from bounding the number of pending rfkill events at a "large" number (i.e. 1000) to prevent abuses like this. Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Reported-by: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com> Reported-by: Yifan Wu <yifanwucs@gmail.com> Reported-by: Juefei Pu <tomapufckgml@gmail.com> Reported-by: Xin Liu <bird@lzu.edu.cn> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2026033013-disfigure-scroll-e25e@gregkh Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c index 2444237bc36a..4827e1fb8804 100644 --- a/net/rfkill/core.c +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c @@ -73,11 +73,14 @@ struct rfkill_int_event { struct rfkill_event_ext ev; }; +/* Max rfkill events that can be "in-flight" for one data source */ +#define MAX_RFKILL_EVENT 1000 struct rfkill_data { struct list_head list; struct list_head events; struct mutex mtx; wait_queue_head_t read_wait; + u32 event_count; bool input_handler; u8 max_size; }; @@ -255,10 +258,12 @@ static void rfkill_global_led_trigger_unregister(void) } #endif /* CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS */ -static void rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_event_ext *ev, - struct rfkill *rfkill, - enum rfkill_operation op) +static int rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_int_event *int_ev, + struct rfkill *rfkill, + struct rfkill_data *data, + enum rfkill_operation op) { + struct rfkill_event_ext *ev = &int_ev->ev; unsigned long flags; ev->idx = rfkill->idx; @@ -271,6 +276,15 @@ static void rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_event_ext *ev, RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_PREV)); ev->hard_block_reasons = rfkill->hard_block_reasons; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rfkill->lock, flags); + + scoped_guard(mutex, &data->mtx) { + if (data->event_count++ > MAX_RFKILL_EVENT) { + data->event_count--; + return -ENOSPC; + } + list_add_tail(&int_ev->list, &data->events); + } + return 0; } static void rfkill_send_events(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_operation op) @@ -282,10 +296,10 @@ static void rfkill_send_events(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_operation op) ev = kzalloc_obj(*ev); if (!ev) continue; - rfkill_fill_event(&ev->ev, rfkill, op); - mutex_lock(&data->mtx); - list_add_tail(&ev->list, &data->events); - mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); + if (rfkill_fill_event(ev, rfkill, data, op)) { + kfree(ev); + continue; + } wake_up_interruptible(&data->read_wait); } } @@ -1186,10 +1200,8 @@ static int rfkill_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) if (!ev) goto free; rfkill_sync(rfkill); - rfkill_fill_event(&ev->ev, rfkill, RFKILL_OP_ADD); - mutex_lock(&data->mtx); - list_add_tail(&ev->list, &data->events); - mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); + if (rfkill_fill_event(ev, rfkill, data, RFKILL_OP_ADD)) + kfree(ev); } list_add(&data->list, &rfkill_fds); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); @@ -1259,6 +1271,7 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_fop_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, ret = -EFAULT; list_del(&ev->list); + data->event_count--; kfree(ev); out: mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf() 2026-04-12 5:16 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh @ 2026-04-12 12:55 ` Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] rfkill: sync before userspace visibility/changes Sasha Levin ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Bo Liu, Simon Horman, Johannes Berg, Sasha Levin From: Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com> [ Upstream commit 796703baead0c2862f7f2ebb9b177590af533035 ] Follow the advice of the Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst and show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the value to be returned to user space. Signed-off-by: Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230206081641.3193-1-liubo03@inspur.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Stable-dep-of: ea245d78dec5 ("net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/rfkill/core.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c index dac4fdc7488a3..65913ac35bd59 100644 --- a/net/rfkill/core.c +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", rfkill->name); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", rfkill->name); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name); @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static ssize_t type_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", rfkill_types[rfkill->type]); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", rfkill_types[rfkill->type]); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(type); @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t index_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", rfkill->idx); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", rfkill->idx); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(index); @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static ssize_t persistent_show(struct device *dev, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", rfkill->persistent); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", rfkill->persistent); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(persistent); @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static ssize_t hard_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", (rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_HW) ? 1 : 0 ); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_HW) ? 1 : 0); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hard); @@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ static ssize_t soft_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", (rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_SW) ? 1 : 0 ); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_SW) ? 1 : 0); } static ssize_t soft_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static ssize_t hard_block_reasons_show(struct device *dev, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "0x%lx\n", rfkill->hard_block_reasons); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%lx\n", rfkill->hard_block_reasons); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hard_block_reasons); @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static ssize_t state_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", user_state_from_blocked(rfkill->state)); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", user_state_from_blocked(rfkill->state)); } static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] rfkill: sync before userspace visibility/changes 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf() Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 ` Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/4] net: rfkill: reduce data->mtx scope in rfkill_fop_open Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 4/4] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created Sasha Levin 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Johannes Berg, Sasha Levin From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> [ Upstream commit 2c3dfba4cf84ac4f306cc6653b37b6dd6859ae9d ] If userspace quickly opens /dev/rfkill after a new instance was created, it might see the old state of the instance from before the sync work runs and may even _change_ the state, only to have the sync work change it again. Fix this by doing the sync inline where needed, not just for /dev/rfkill but also for sysfs. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Stable-dep-of: ea245d78dec5 ("net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/rfkill/core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c index 65913ac35bd59..981771598f1eb 100644 --- a/net/rfkill/core.c +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct rfkill { bool persistent; bool polling_paused; bool suspended; + bool need_sync; const struct rfkill_ops *ops; void *data; @@ -368,6 +369,17 @@ static void rfkill_set_block(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool blocked) rfkill_event(rfkill); } +static void rfkill_sync(struct rfkill *rfkill) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&rfkill_global_mutex); + + if (!rfkill->need_sync) + return; + + rfkill_set_block(rfkill, rfkill_global_states[rfkill->type].cur); + rfkill->need_sync = false; +} + static void rfkill_update_global_state(enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked) { int i; @@ -730,6 +742,10 @@ static ssize_t soft_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); + mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex); + rfkill_sync(rfkill); + mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_SW) ? 1 : 0); } @@ -751,6 +767,7 @@ static ssize_t soft_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex); + rfkill_sync(rfkill); rfkill_set_block(rfkill, state); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); @@ -783,6 +800,10 @@ static ssize_t state_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); + mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex); + rfkill_sync(rfkill); + mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", user_state_from_blocked(rfkill->state)); } @@ -805,6 +826,7 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex); + rfkill_sync(rfkill); rfkill_set_block(rfkill, state == RFKILL_USER_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); @@ -1032,14 +1054,10 @@ static void rfkill_uevent_work(struct work_struct *work) static void rfkill_sync_work(struct work_struct *work) { - struct rfkill *rfkill; - bool cur; - - rfkill = container_of(work, struct rfkill, sync_work); + struct rfkill *rfkill = container_of(work, struct rfkill, sync_work); mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex); - cur = rfkill_global_states[rfkill->type].cur; - rfkill_set_block(rfkill, cur); + rfkill_sync(rfkill); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); } @@ -1087,6 +1105,7 @@ int __must_check rfkill_register(struct rfkill *rfkill) round_jiffies_relative(POLL_INTERVAL)); if (!rfkill->persistent || rfkill_epo_lock_active) { + rfkill->need_sync = true; schedule_work(&rfkill->sync_work); } else { #ifdef CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT @@ -1171,6 +1190,7 @@ static int rfkill_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) ev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ev), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ev) goto free; + rfkill_sync(rfkill); rfkill_fill_event(&ev->ev, rfkill, RFKILL_OP_ADD); list_add_tail(&ev->list, &data->events); } -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.1.y 3/4] net: rfkill: reduce data->mtx scope in rfkill_fop_open 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf() Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] rfkill: sync before userspace visibility/changes Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 ` Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 4/4] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created Sasha Levin 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable; +Cc: Johannes Berg, syzbot+509238e523e032442b80, Sasha Levin From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> [ Upstream commit f2ac54ebf85615a6d78f5eb213a8bbeeb17ebe5d ] In syzbot runs, lockdep reports that there's a (potential) deadlock here of data->mtx being locked recursively. This isn't really a deadlock since they are different instances, but lockdep cannot know, and teaching it would be far more difficult than other fixes. At the same time we don't even really _need_ the mutex to be locked in rfkill_fop_open(), since we're modifying only a completely fresh instance of 'data' (struct rfkill_data) that's not yet added to the global list. However, to avoid any reordering etc. within the globally locked section, and to make the code look more symmetric, we should still lock the data->events list manipulation, but also need to lock _only_ that. So do that. Reported-by: syzbot+509238e523e032442b80@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 2c3dfba4cf84 ("rfkill: sync before userspace visibility/changes") Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Stable-dep-of: ea245d78dec5 ("net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/rfkill/core.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c index 981771598f1eb..7ec100adf5945 100644 --- a/net/rfkill/core.c +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c @@ -1180,7 +1180,6 @@ static int rfkill_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) init_waitqueue_head(&data->read_wait); mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex); - mutex_lock(&data->mtx); /* * start getting events from elsewhere but hold mtx to get * startup events added first @@ -1192,10 +1191,11 @@ static int rfkill_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) goto free; rfkill_sync(rfkill); rfkill_fill_event(&ev->ev, rfkill, RFKILL_OP_ADD); + mutex_lock(&data->mtx); list_add_tail(&ev->list, &data->events); + mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); } list_add(&data->list, &rfkill_fds); - mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); file->private_data = data; @@ -1203,7 +1203,6 @@ static int rfkill_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) return stream_open(inode, file); free: - mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); mutex_destroy(&data->mtx); list_for_each_entry_safe(ev, tmp, &data->events, list) -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6.1.y 4/4] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf() Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] rfkill: sync before userspace visibility/changes Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/4] net: rfkill: reduce data->mtx scope in rfkill_fop_open Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 ` Sasha Levin 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-04-12 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Johannes Berg, Yuan Tan, Yifan Wu, Juefei Pu, Xin Liu, stable, Johannes Berg, Sasha Levin From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> [ Upstream commit ea245d78dec594372e27d8c79616baf49e98a4a1 ] Userspace can create an unlimited number of rfkill events if the system is so configured, while not consuming them from the rfkill file descriptor, causing a potential out of memory situation. Prevent this from bounding the number of pending rfkill events at a "large" number (i.e. 1000) to prevent abuses like this. Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Reported-by: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com> Reported-by: Yifan Wu <yifanwucs@gmail.com> Reported-by: Juefei Pu <tomapufckgml@gmail.com> Reported-by: Xin Liu <bird@lzu.edu.cn> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2026033013-disfigure-scroll-e25e@gregkh Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/rfkill/core.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c index 7ec100adf5945..7a995e7a491b5 100644 --- a/net/rfkill/core.c +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c @@ -73,11 +73,14 @@ struct rfkill_int_event { struct rfkill_event_ext ev; }; +/* Max rfkill events that can be "in-flight" for one data source */ +#define MAX_RFKILL_EVENT 1000 struct rfkill_data { struct list_head list; struct list_head events; struct mutex mtx; wait_queue_head_t read_wait; + u32 event_count; bool input_handler; u8 max_size; }; @@ -255,10 +258,12 @@ static void rfkill_global_led_trigger_unregister(void) } #endif /* CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS */ -static void rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_event_ext *ev, - struct rfkill *rfkill, - enum rfkill_operation op) +static int rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_int_event *int_ev, + struct rfkill *rfkill, + struct rfkill_data *data, + enum rfkill_operation op) { + struct rfkill_event_ext *ev = &int_ev->ev; unsigned long flags; ev->idx = rfkill->idx; @@ -271,6 +276,15 @@ static void rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_event_ext *ev, RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_PREV)); ev->hard_block_reasons = rfkill->hard_block_reasons; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rfkill->lock, flags); + + scoped_guard(mutex, &data->mtx) { + if (data->event_count++ > MAX_RFKILL_EVENT) { + data->event_count--; + return -ENOSPC; + } + list_add_tail(&int_ev->list, &data->events); + } + return 0; } static void rfkill_send_events(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_operation op) @@ -282,10 +296,10 @@ static void rfkill_send_events(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_operation op) ev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ev), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ev) continue; - rfkill_fill_event(&ev->ev, rfkill, op); - mutex_lock(&data->mtx); - list_add_tail(&ev->list, &data->events); - mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); + if (rfkill_fill_event(ev, rfkill, data, op)) { + kfree(ev); + continue; + } wake_up_interruptible(&data->read_wait); } } @@ -1190,10 +1204,8 @@ static int rfkill_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) if (!ev) goto free; rfkill_sync(rfkill); - rfkill_fill_event(&ev->ev, rfkill, RFKILL_OP_ADD); - mutex_lock(&data->mtx); - list_add_tail(&ev->list, &data->events); - mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); + if (rfkill_fill_event(ev, rfkill, data, RFKILL_OP_ADD)) + kfree(ev); } list_add(&data->list, &rfkill_fds); mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex); @@ -1263,6 +1275,7 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_fop_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, ret = -EFAULT; list_del(&ev->list); + data->event_count--; kfree(ev); out: mutex_unlock(&data->mtx); -- 2.53.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-12 12:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-04-12 5:16 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] rfkill: Use sysfs_emit() to instead of sprintf() Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] rfkill: sync before userspace visibility/changes Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/4] net: rfkill: reduce data->mtx scope in rfkill_fop_open Sasha Levin 2026-04-12 12:55 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 4/4] net: rfkill: prevent unlimited numbers of rfkill events from being created Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox