public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y] rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:26:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414152632.863735-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026041329-payable-barmaid-1f71@gregkh>

From: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>

[ Upstream commit a44ce6aa2efb61fe44f2cfab72bb01544bbca272 ]

The AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into
fixed 50-byte stack buffers with "%pISpc".

That is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the
formatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a
dotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP
addresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap().

As a result, a case such as

  [ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535

is possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so
51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing
char[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c.

Size the buffers from the formatter's maximum textual form and switch the
call sites to scnprintf().

Changes since v1:
- correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case
  explicitly
- frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier
  mapped-v4 example

Fixes: 75b54cb57ca3 ("rxrpc: Add IPv6 support")
Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408121252.2249051-22-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ adapted address accessors and variable declarations ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/proc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/proc.c b/net/rxrpc/proc.c
index 8967201fd8e54..67553dfe6a3e4 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/proc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/proc.c
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
 #include <net/af_rxrpc.h>
 #include "ar-internal.h"
 
+#define RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE \
+	(sizeof("[xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:255.255.255.255]") + \
+	 sizeof(":12345"))
+
 static const char *const rxrpc_conn_states[RXRPC_CONN__NR_STATES] = {
 	[RXRPC_CONN_UNUSED]			= "Unused  ",
 	[RXRPC_CONN_CLIENT]			= "Client  ",
@@ -61,7 +65,7 @@ static int rxrpc_call_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	struct rxrpc_net *rxnet = rxrpc_net(seq_file_net(seq));
 	unsigned long timeout = 0;
 	rxrpc_seq_t tx_hard_ack, rx_hard_ack;
-	char lbuff[50], rbuff[50];
+	char lbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE], rbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE];
 
 	if (v == &rxnet->calls) {
 		seq_puts(seq,
@@ -78,7 +82,7 @@ static int rxrpc_call_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	if (rx) {
 		local = READ_ONCE(rx->local);
 		if (local)
-			sprintf(lbuff, "%pISpc", &local->srx.transport);
+			scnprintf(lbuff, sizeof(lbuff), "%pISpc", &local->srx.transport);
 		else
 			strcpy(lbuff, "no_local");
 	} else {
@@ -87,7 +91,7 @@ static int rxrpc_call_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 	peer = call->peer;
 	if (peer)
-		sprintf(rbuff, "%pISpc", &peer->srx.transport);
+		scnprintf(rbuff, sizeof(rbuff), "%pISpc", &peer->srx.transport);
 	else
 		strcpy(rbuff, "no_connection");
 
@@ -158,7 +162,7 @@ static int rxrpc_connection_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
 	struct rxrpc_connection *conn;
 	struct rxrpc_net *rxnet = rxrpc_net(seq_file_net(seq));
-	char lbuff[50], rbuff[50];
+	char lbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE], rbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE];
 
 	if (v == &rxnet->conn_proc_list) {
 		seq_puts(seq,
@@ -177,9 +181,9 @@ static int rxrpc_connection_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		goto print;
 	}
 
-	sprintf(lbuff, "%pISpc", &conn->params.local->srx.transport);
+	scnprintf(lbuff, sizeof(lbuff), "%pISpc", &conn->params.local->srx.transport);
 
-	sprintf(rbuff, "%pISpc", &conn->params.peer->srx.transport);
+	scnprintf(rbuff, sizeof(rbuff), "%pISpc", &conn->params.peer->srx.transport);
 print:
 	seq_printf(seq,
 		   "UDP   %-47.47s %-47.47s %4x %08x %s %3u"
@@ -216,7 +220,7 @@ static int rxrpc_peer_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
 	struct rxrpc_peer *peer;
 	time64_t now;
-	char lbuff[50], rbuff[50];
+	char lbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE], rbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE];
 
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
 		seq_puts(seq,
@@ -229,9 +233,9 @@ static int rxrpc_peer_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 	peer = list_entry(v, struct rxrpc_peer, hash_link);
 
-	sprintf(lbuff, "%pISpc", &peer->local->srx.transport);
+	scnprintf(lbuff, sizeof(lbuff), "%pISpc", &peer->local->srx.transport);
 
-	sprintf(rbuff, "%pISpc", &peer->srx.transport);
+	scnprintf(rbuff, sizeof(rbuff), "%pISpc", &peer->srx.transport);
 
 	now = ktime_get_seconds();
 	seq_printf(seq,
@@ -341,7 +345,7 @@ const struct seq_operations rxrpc_peer_seq_ops = {
 static int rxrpc_local_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
 	struct rxrpc_local *local;
-	char lbuff[50];
+	char lbuff[RXRPC_PROC_ADDRBUF_SIZE];
 
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
 		seq_puts(seq,
@@ -352,7 +356,7 @@ static int rxrpc_local_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 	local = hlist_entry(v, struct rxrpc_local, link);
 
-	sprintf(lbuff, "%pISpc", &local->srx.transport);
+	scnprintf(lbuff, sizeof(lbuff), "%pISpc", &local->srx.transport);
 
 	seq_printf(seq,
 		   "UDP   %-47.47s %3u %3u\n",
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-14 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-13 12:37 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2026-04-14 15:26 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260414152632.863735-1-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=anderson@allelesecurity.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox