From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org,gechangwei@live.cn,heming.zhao@suse.com,jiangqi903@gmail.com,jlbec@evilplan.org,junxiao.bi@oracle.com,mark@fasheh.com,piaojun@huawei.com,stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ocfs2: fix possible deadlock between unlink and" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:05:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026042003-rocking-engine-1cb6@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x b02da26a992db0c0e2559acbda0fc48d4a2fd337
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026042003-rocking-engine-1cb6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b02da26a992db0c0e2559acbda0fc48d4a2fd337 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 11:22:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix possible deadlock between unlink and
dio_end_io_write
ocfs2_unlink takes orphan dir inode_lock first and then ip_alloc_sem,
while in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write, it acquires these locks in reverse order.
This creates an ABBA lock ordering violation on lock classes
ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[ORPHAN_DIR_SYSTEM_INODE] and
ocfs2_file_ip_alloc_sem_key.
Lock Chain #0 (orphan dir inode_lock -> ip_alloc_sem):
ocfs2_unlink
ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir
ocfs2_lookup_lock_orphan_dir
inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode) <- lock A
__ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir
ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert
ocfs2_extend_dir
ocfs2_expand_inline_dir
down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem) <- Lock B
Lock Chain #1 (ip_alloc_sem -> orphan dir inode_lock):
ocfs2_dio_end_io_write
down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem) <- Lock B
ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan()
inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode) <- Lock A
Deadlock Scenario:
CPU0 (unlink) CPU1 (dio_end_io_write)
------ ------
inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode)
down_write(ip_alloc_sem)
down_write(ip_alloc_sem)
inode_lock(orphan_dir_inode)
Since ip_alloc_sem is to protect allocation changes, which is unrelated
with operations in ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan. So move
ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan out of ip_alloc_sem to fix the deadlock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260306032211.1016452-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Reported-by: syzbot+67b90111784a3eac8c04@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=67b90111784a3eac8c04
Fixes: a86a72a4a4e0 ("ocfs2: take ip_alloc_sem in ocfs2_dio_get_block & ocfs2_dio_end_io_write")
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
index 17ba79f443ee..09146b43d1f0 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
@@ -2294,8 +2294,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
goto out;
}
- down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
-
/* Delete orphan before acquire i_rwsem. */
if (dwc->dw_orphaned) {
BUG_ON(dwc->dw_writer_pid != task_pid_nr(current));
@@ -2308,6 +2306,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
mlog_errno(ret);
}
+ down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
ocfs2_init_dinode_extent_tree(&et, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh);
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 13:05 gregkh [this message]
2026-04-20 14:58 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] fs/ocfs2: fix comments mentioning i_mutex Sasha Levin
2026-04-20 14:58 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] ocfs2: fix possible deadlock between unlink and dio_end_io_write Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026042003-rocking-engine-1cb6@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gechangwei@live.cn \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox