From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADF433F5A9; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776701478; cv=none; b=FN8AXM6nvY3gOfceOCC4oidWh5dvMsynn+wZjnAMQlB3ZaHVjouICVkIQJn6hIWi/C0LrSlNxVLG5LsPGbo1UzXLGevONeyObWBzcFza9gurAfC29Bkwqv4/IaJ+cOFBIf0f+FwgNupqt+SllAqEjmYolmlPykC61GfZoZwpsRk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776701478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f4wQ04nCct4Kc1irCUc5zVgM9iytVM6yECFsXDY2C2k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ZV10DUd9eDirBDb7r9QBjTsg3R/LGWIkWaa4F+p0QXSngdJFL1QIy8QHMaQynfg9O8eAmXmtyysI2k/hgCMnLmtU/ew9agCvRnWvw8VMkWydpjG4LhPZUjbgdT1pJrbHJWr9FjayBxgRSrdbVuTm0xT6LtGG0WPw0mbG8/SywLU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=SwldTvkD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="SwldTvkD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7AFBC19425; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:11:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1776701478; bh=f4wQ04nCct4Kc1irCUc5zVgM9iytVM6yECFsXDY2C2k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SwldTvkDRqTfuclRqWIGXaNPG+wDb5TwVnJur6tBwPATBRAiNqBiV4NnHmb7Nsag/ q6lLFzOf0PN6+LEVL+ncWI4cvQh4rJsdVVgAWZ6TBANLD84rUT0NiHOdLy4wMRRGHQ CEDYZ26QRY8W9v1fg6R8xw5runUK5/BqhB72OT44= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Jethro Beekman , Sean Christopherson Subject: [PATCH 6.12 130/162] KVM: SEV: Disallow LAUNCH_FINISH if vCPUs are actively being created Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:42:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20260420153931.752290932@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260420153927.006696811@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260420153927.006696811@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sean Christopherson commit 624bf3440d7214b62c22d698a0a294323f331d5d upstream. Reject LAUNCH_FINISH for SEV-ES and SNP VMs if KVM is actively creating one or more vCPUs, as KVM needs to process and encrypt each vCPU's VMSA. Letting userspace create vCPUs while LAUNCH_FINISH is in-progress is "fine", at least in the current code base, as kvm_for_each_vcpu() operates on online_vcpus, LAUNCH_FINISH (all SEV+ sub-ioctls) holds kvm->mutex, and fully onlining a vCPU in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() is done under kvm->mutex. I.e. there's no difference between an in-progress vCPU and a vCPU that is created entirely after LAUNCH_FINISH. However, given that concurrent LAUNCH_FINISH and vCPU creation can't possibly work (for any reasonable definition of "work"), since userspace can't guarantee whether a particular vCPU will be encrypted or not, disallow the combination as a hardening measure, to reduce the probability of introducing bugs in the future, and to avoid having to reason about the safety of future changes related to LAUNCH_FINISH. Cc: Jethro Beekman Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b31f7c6e-2807-4662-bcdd-eea2c1e132fa@fortanix.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260310234829.2608037-5-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 10 ++++++++-- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c @@ -962,6 +962,9 @@ static int sev_launch_update_vmsa(struct if (!sev_es_guest(kvm)) return -ENOTTY; + if (kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(kvm)) + return -EBUSY; + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) { ret = mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex); if (ret) @@ -2061,8 +2064,8 @@ static int sev_check_source_vcpus(struct struct kvm_vcpu *src_vcpu; unsigned long i; - if (src->created_vcpus != atomic_read(&src->online_vcpus) || - dst->created_vcpus != atomic_read(&dst->online_vcpus)) + if (kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(src) || + kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(dst)) return -EBUSY; if (!sev_es_guest(src)) @@ -2456,6 +2459,9 @@ static int snp_launch_update_vmsa(struct unsigned long i; int ret; + if (kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(kvm)) + return -EBUSY; + data.gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context); data.page_type = SNP_PAGE_TYPE_VMSA; --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -1017,6 +1017,13 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_v return NULL; } +static inline bool kvm_is_vcpu_creation_in_progress(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock); + + return kvm->created_vcpus != atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus); +} + void kvm_destroy_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm); void vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);