From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE78935979; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776753711; cv=none; b=alVNZ4lZF6oJ/HEWMSqG3IKNiC4sdNde3wQm7L9oiIpDivymQnPfhPUbokiA7cUSOhPqj+Cm8RLO59ilYZv5nwIGODF9ASz4TyZLgmmXBdQ5m+yfUCGosN+ALMYk3EAX2RCkwr/M9cWLNFdvbFoudtpEvWMRLmBlp6G2PUkmync= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776753711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+ipSU820E6LpVopDoZIXdrJ6aRl4Cc2ecFHSCrYZhIc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IqsO0SehWk6nsm+FxBTPqqTMye+p8ytXzfCnK7k9ZbUvdc4QKyg8r5ABY2a8kdSlA4My7FW1diiAt56W+wOmI38prVEF4S2vZmW4JCdISdEu644yMrj/jObVHQ/kxpwnz5KNUSL/A7OtANDI/iD2EuWPGgBLx6RMgnTYQPfOsa4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=sdjwREFw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="sdjwREFw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21120C2BCB0; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:41:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1776753710; bh=+ipSU820E6LpVopDoZIXdrJ6aRl4Cc2ecFHSCrYZhIc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sdjwREFw2an5QQZlS3EW2H8NwKUXUmAnrVu/OEniFOC6pX/d6xDDXCc5+5sZz8dtx y9FXodmXeoCREADn1JRJ67Rl+BgcrZlNSlZDxiMDqtbQlANGW8Jv0/oX8j0o1941NW Dxumj9d+PEALnYqx08QqX8x6fJGoGEUiu8cIVjAI= Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:41:17 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Hanabishi , Eric Naim , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux kernel regressions list Subject: Re: [tip: timers/urgent] clockevents: Add missing resets of the next_event_forced flag Message-ID: <2026042110-surpass-petite-9551@gregkh> References: <87340xfeje.ffs@tglx> <177636758252.1323100.5283878386670888513.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <5cbb14d8-46f9-4197-917f-51da852d7500@leemhuis.info> <87mrywdeen.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 08:26:35AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 4/21/26 08:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 19 2026 at 17:11, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > >> On 4/16/26 21:26, tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >>> The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip: > >>> > >>> Commit-ID: 4096fd0e8eaea13ebe5206700b33f49635ae18e5 > >>> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4096fd0e8eaea13ebe5206700b33f49635ae18e5 > >>> Author: Thomas Gleixner > >>> AuthorDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:55:01 +02:00 > >>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner > >>> CommitterDate: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:22:04 +02:00 > >>> > >>> clockevents: Add missing resets of the next_event_forced flag > >> > >> Just wondering: what's the plan to mainline this? I wonder if this is > >> worth mainlining rather quickly and the tell the stable team right > >> afterwards to queue it up for 7.0.1, as in addition to the two affected > >> people in this thread (one of which stated that "several users from > >> CachyOS reported this regression as well") I noticed three more 7.0 bug > >> reports in the past few days that likely are fixed by the quoted patch: > > > > It's in Linus tree and I asked the stable folks to withhold the original > > patch which it fixes, so they can queue both at once. > > Yeah, I noticed, and many thx! Also many thx for planning the backport, > this is great. But that "original patch" is already in 7.0, which makes > me wonder: > > Should we ask Greg (now CCed) to include a backport (once it exists) for > 7.0.1, even if that is in testing already and might mean that this needs > another stable-rc or delayed? Because in addition to those three reports > I mentioned earlier I noticed one more today: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221377 > > And maybe this is the same issue, too: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221388 > > IOW: quite a few people are hitting this. I've already dropped this from all of the other stable queues. If you want me to pick up something from linux-next now, for 7.0.1, I'll be glad to do so, just let me know. thanks, greg k-h