From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y] rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure
Date: Sun, 3 May 2026 06:59:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260503105934.1030665-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026050101-dizzy-vividly-dc7b@gregkh>
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 1f2740150f904bfa60e4bad74d65add3ccb5e7f8 ]
If skb_unshare() fails to unshare a packet due to allocation failure in
rxrpc_input_packet(), the skb pointer in the parent (rxrpc_io_thread())
will be NULL'd out. This will likely cause the call to
trace_rxrpc_rx_done() to oops.
Fix this by moving the unsharing down to where rxrpc_input_call_event()
calls rxrpc_input_call_packet(). There are a number of places prior to
that where we ignore DATA packets for a variety of reasons (such as the
call already being complete) for which an unshare is then avoided.
And with that, rxrpc_input_packet() doesn't need to take a pointer to the
pointer to the packet, so change that to just a pointer.
Fixes: 2d1faf7a0ca3 ("rxrpc: Simplify skbuff accounting in receive path")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260408121252.2249051-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260422161438.2593376-4-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ adapted to per-skb rxrpc_input_call_event() signature ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 4 ++--
net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 1 -
net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
net/rxrpc/io_thread.c | 24 ++----------------------
net/rxrpc/skbuff.c | 9 ---------
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
index 3eb806f7bc6a5..b6669a576fd58 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
@@ -126,8 +126,7 @@
E_(rxrpc_call_poke_timer_now, "Timer-now")
#define rxrpc_skb_traces \
- EM(rxrpc_skb_eaten_by_unshare, "ETN unshare ") \
- EM(rxrpc_skb_eaten_by_unshare_nomem, "ETN unshar-nm") \
+ EM(rxrpc_skb_get_call_rx, "GET call-rx ") \
EM(rxrpc_skb_get_conn_secured, "GET conn-secd") \
EM(rxrpc_skb_get_conn_work, "GET conn-work") \
EM(rxrpc_skb_get_last_nack, "GET last-nack") \
@@ -152,6 +151,7 @@
EM(rxrpc_skb_see_recvmsg, "SEE recvmsg ") \
EM(rxrpc_skb_see_reject, "SEE reject ") \
EM(rxrpc_skb_see_rotate, "SEE rotate ") \
+ EM(rxrpc_skb_see_unshare_nomem, "SEE unshar-nm") \
E_(rxrpc_skb_see_version, "SEE version ")
#define rxrpc_local_traces \
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 1494d162444dd..63cd5217b4ee3 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -1260,7 +1260,6 @@ int rxrpc_server_keyring(struct rxrpc_sock *, sockptr_t, int);
void rxrpc_kernel_data_consumed(struct rxrpc_call *, struct sk_buff *);
void rxrpc_new_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_see_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
-void rxrpc_eaten_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_get_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
index 7bbb685047667..81d77b7449f7e 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
@@ -342,8 +342,28 @@ bool rxrpc_input_call_event(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (skb && skb->mark == RXRPC_SKB_MARK_ERROR)
goto out;
- if (skb)
- rxrpc_input_call_packet(call, skb);
+ if (skb) {
+ struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
+
+ if (sp->hdr.securityIndex != 0 &&
+ skb_cloned(skb)) {
+ /* Unshare the packet so that it can be modified for
+ * in-place decryption.
+ */
+ struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+ if (nskb) {
+ rxrpc_new_skb(nskb, rxrpc_skb_new_unshared);
+ rxrpc_input_call_packet(call, nskb);
+ rxrpc_free_skb(nskb, rxrpc_skb_put_input);
+ } else {
+ /* OOM - Drop the packet. */
+ rxrpc_see_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_see_unshare_nomem);
+ }
+ } else {
+ rxrpc_input_call_packet(call, skb);
+ }
+ }
/* If we see our async-event poke, check for timeout trippage. */
now = ktime_get_real();
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c b/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c
index 83c5f715c6b73..8270cac0488d9 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c
@@ -178,13 +178,12 @@ static bool rxrpc_extract_abort(struct sk_buff *skb)
/*
* Process packets received on the local endpoint
*/
-static bool rxrpc_input_packet(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct sk_buff **_skb)
+static bool rxrpc_input_packet(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct rxrpc_connection *conn;
struct sockaddr_rxrpc peer_srx;
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
struct rxrpc_peer *peer = NULL;
- struct sk_buff *skb = *_skb;
bool ret = false;
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr));
@@ -230,25 +229,6 @@ static bool rxrpc_input_packet(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct sk_buff **_skb)
return rxrpc_bad_message(skb, rxrpc_badmsg_zero_call);
if (sp->hdr.seq == 0)
return rxrpc_bad_message(skb, rxrpc_badmsg_zero_seq);
-
- /* Unshare the packet so that it can be modified for in-place
- * decryption.
- */
- if (sp->hdr.securityIndex != 0) {
- skb = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!skb) {
- rxrpc_eaten_skb(*_skb, rxrpc_skb_eaten_by_unshare_nomem);
- *_skb = NULL;
- return just_discard;
- }
-
- if (skb != *_skb) {
- rxrpc_eaten_skb(*_skb, rxrpc_skb_eaten_by_unshare);
- *_skb = skb;
- rxrpc_new_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_new_unshared);
- sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
- }
- }
break;
case RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_CHALLENGE:
@@ -490,7 +470,7 @@ int rxrpc_io_thread(void *data)
switch (skb->mark) {
case RXRPC_SKB_MARK_PACKET:
skb->priority = 0;
- if (!rxrpc_input_packet(local, &skb))
+ if (!rxrpc_input_packet(local, skb))
rxrpc_reject_packet(local, skb);
trace_rxrpc_rx_done(skb->mark, skb->priority);
rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_put_input);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c b/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
index 3bcd6ee803960..e2169d1a14b5f 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
@@ -46,15 +46,6 @@ void rxrpc_get_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace why)
skb_get(skb);
}
-/*
- * Note the dropping of a ref on a socket buffer by the core.
- */
-void rxrpc_eaten_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace why)
-{
- int n = atomic_inc_return(&rxrpc_n_rx_skbs);
- trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, 0, n, why);
-}
-
/*
* Note the destruction of a socket buffer.
*/
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-03 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 12:01 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-03 10:59 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260503105934.1030665-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox