From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 14:04:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026050415-program-rejoicing-0c01@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260503141723.1081399-1-sashal@kernel.org>
On Sun, May 03, 2026 at 10:17:23AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 24481a7f573305706054c59e275371f8d0fe919f ]
>
> The security operations that verify the RESPONSE packets decrypt bits of it
> in place - however, the sk_buff may be shared with a packet sniffer, which
> would lead to the sniffer seeing an apparently corrupt packet (actually
> decrypted).
>
> Fix this by handing a copy of the packet off to the specific security
> handler if the packet was cloned.
>
> Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260408121252.2249051-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
> cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
> cc: stable@kernel.org
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260422161438.2593376-5-dhowells@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 2 ++
> net/rxrpc/conn_event.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> index 3eb806f7bc6a5..c5533176d770d 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> @@ -146,12 +146,14 @@
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_jumbo_subpacket, "PUT jumbo-sub") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_last_nack, "PUT last-nack") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_purge, "PUT purge ") \
> + EM(rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy, "PUT resp-cpy ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_rotate, "PUT rotate ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_unknown, "PUT unknown ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_see_conn_work, "SEE conn-work") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_see_recvmsg, "SEE recvmsg ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_see_reject, "SEE reject ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_see_rotate, "SEE rotate ") \
> + EM(rxrpc_skb_see_unshare_nomem, "SEE unshar-nm") \
> E_(rxrpc_skb_see_version, "SEE version ")
>
> #define rxrpc_local_traces \
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> index 6ef2dc1aa8cc2..6d7b064661d88 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,33 @@ static void rxrpc_call_is_secure(struct rxrpc_call *call)
> rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
> }
>
> +static int rxrpc_verify_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (skb_cloned(skb)) {
> + /* Copy the packet if shared so that we can do in-place
> + * decryption.
> + */
> + struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_NOFS);
> +
> + if (nskb) {
> + rxrpc_new_skb(nskb, rxrpc_skb_new_unshared);
> + ret = conn->security->verify_response(conn, nskb);
> + rxrpc_free_skb(nskb, rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy);
> + } else {
> + /* OOM - Drop the packet. */
> + rxrpc_see_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_see_unshare_nomem);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = conn->security->verify_response(conn, skb);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * connection-level Rx packet processor
> */
> @@ -253,7 +280,7 @@ static int rxrpc_process_event(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
> }
> spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock);
>
> - ret = conn->security->verify_response(conn, skb);
> + ret = rxrpc_verify_response(conn, skb);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
Does not apply :(
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 12:07 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-03 14:17 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Sasha Levin
2026-05-04 12:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026050415-program-rejoicing-0c01@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox