From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ot1-f45.google.com (mail-ot1-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742E2264614 for ; Tue, 5 May 2026 17:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778000837; cv=none; b=eCOFjsTSBdUW9BEPOnhuTQg19iVBfFERW9+jzKmQD1accuh9InlGUKcI4/xHaKSiH3frNgdFInbLPO+B1Oz/RTGpcfXgxwCHWCW0rGs0/PsqgZZgvqjV4xNboO3CGM/Ukx6lyjUx9JE0bpcBp8NNBPkxTzmhwV7CuW1b17T5oDA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778000837; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vw1Yz1M6ntRpNsMHRphRJy36953fAzli8KY6gviS25I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=FPkNuSa+7taKtPbfjbGyEzRP60CGLt1yVTeXAuw+PNfCg1Ls93y1yAZ097YMr+9P06uEk/Uam5nPlv5dw0mMCWK1u+DzQFSWtem+rUK2/heEw/g0pimcC2KsmOulCqL7xGv+ZFPbxHSMbyr7FefKKft92zEFYraRwi7mDQtVzmM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=NPYMGG43; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="NPYMGG43" Received: by mail-ot1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7de7dc85b74so4959778a34.2 for ; Tue, 05 May 2026 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778000835; x=1778605635; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bgyzmCLBZb8njVeoHc/WQXkO4KGEQm3rkpc/IuvAWz8=; b=NPYMGG43WqGp+YAYON7G4MdEUatsKkFlhmNA20fFY6VSU6EisIV2FQGh6i6xGCbexa UdUMWYF/d5NM2UlXyLcgrwYyoyC+G2utej7MOIKJRmeCGizPKlBOkUz6I9jqhgaeLXyJ e66bCEZaO20xZJMd7Za+FBp9eAwUydLICb8RvaRATxh0EoWrsmI/YZmqeDHSIgyiqpTE ZX5ER35Eg+GgpiA2z2Zd2RJCGC7UajKndFsDPTkyYUM49oWSey6r4w+wPR9Tlns56bAs oUbcbsJYKvdv7d2KhBj7jGgR9q3V77TkPSR7K+8ezE7se6oeClDeVq7zZ5v0pygvYGyv tjzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778000835; x=1778605635; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bgyzmCLBZb8njVeoHc/WQXkO4KGEQm3rkpc/IuvAWz8=; b=eSrRS3pyoQi4HGALgjuGVMe8DyjiDup0QyteXfkfwyfeQ92Gpg8btKFr6T2mAZJlPS V7GWJQIJUW5ngdH8pWIcX4e7UCQH9GBQYxBABAEmTXzvsSreiGKU10ow8qQPQ9icAXpW PQGrucB1DntW+MlOWGAVpODdqSX+XZNc9IIV/5vykIFqiPpWDBihICQZ+ZJ0VvOYKn+v q7TYpGATfcWWzcbNUsBFq0QHtumSCpkIZzdtJbdHitRZhgWhsaR+9nODZ6Ti+bdP+/Uw 2yYX59tB6aspPG1SGj+Iham9bh+WlU8kjEwWGiAuLAUPDJoR1HGKx8tRN8CrqtXpGZex X+lQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8S3emeOdKruoG3xatOuKR39yun/ZhYaKKdV4CnvtZE9o7imHU8YQlPF5+lfjAWJszy3A4loGg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzfb3dgOI4R9pJmqhBwytNhboUWoEbI1fJHlbTPLp4kFxD/9YxP rUW5vuMFUgYVBVfyriwA0zE7tqK78N6ZI86iWKN/QoBGddSTQETQ72NF X-Gm-Gg: AeBDieul5eiqo/k92hVX6jFMkH2XxnMu3/gxNRveShC2SDOGWXdiit5p68oi/BqisV5 5rmfsnwxUN2X6aFlUEuAaRVPdThKQyY2/BI3SJNKjOqciblxWlgRTYjY307Hmcp2w/qt4/wJz6Y +pl7YG2sdQgXCkPZGtNzlQbQ3H8bZ5VuB0sSUb9RabZrkWKhg83wQzSNL4P6gFEQVe2ZC9c04pb sCH9yP5iOiHfn+NH8V7bjtpXXJTk5ngamN1WgT5SP4HUTv58e+Dyj98Uh8t7NIUAqK3rA8A9REH b0hTFUFGI9X673GIMQVG3cOXDKJzVJUI9kw0tjvxgAwq5ut4XOtddrDF5lG90T2+DP0HEeKcBaC YM+Sa0njHxn4uzAw+rSeKPN5bS2pdl5tzszXyfyTTqcjfBmxzqzbWKIJ4ZXvMmXtqd1e1+2eIO3 q1wr7tkmwOctGEAPIW7RMJ4RY/cUa9uC0lD+vF+hxfT5ZfK0IRKjMJyPMoNv4La02RGnraMUDLp LwUUPE9q8taCzbOuqHTH9wUFjCk+lQvBqR3VPs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6686:b0:7dc:d0cc:91b with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-7dee149eb40mr10122943a34.26.1778000835319; Tue, 05 May 2026 10:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TDC4045031631.e0cglfehwr0e5gttmepj3hi3hf.ux.internal.cloudapp.net ([20.63.37.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-8b53d6442d0sm151261756d6.46.2026.05.05.10.07.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 May 2026 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Ashutosh Desai To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david+nfc@ixit.cz, Ashutosh Desai Subject: [PATCH v7] nfc: hci: fix out-of-bounds read in HCP header parsing Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 17:07:12 +0000 Message-Id: <20260505170712.96560-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Both nfc_hci_recv_from_llc() and nci_hci_data_received_cb() read packet->header from skb->data at function entry without first checking that the buffer holds at least one byte. A malicious NFC peer can send a 0-byte HCP frame that passes through the SHDLC layer and reaches these functions, causing an out-of-bounds heap read of packet->header. The same 0-byte frame, if queued as a non-final fragment, also causes the reassembly loop to underflow msg_len to UINT_MAX, triggering skb_over_panic() when the reassembled skb is written. Fix this by adding a pskb_may_pull() check at the entry of each function before packet->header is first accessed. The existing pskb_may_pull() checks before the reassembled hcp_skb is cast to struct hcp_packet remain in place to guard the 2-byte HCP message header. Fixes: 8b8d2e08bf0d ("NFC: HCI support") Fixes: 11f54f228643 ("NFC: nci: Add HCI over NCI protocol support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Desai --- Changes in v7: - Add David Heidelberg to CC (NFC subsystem maintainer) Changes in v6: - Add pskb_may_pull(skb, 1) at function entry in both functions before packet->header is first accessed, to fix OOB read on 0-byte frames and prevent integer underflow in the fragment reassembly path (Paolo Abeni) V6 -> V7: add NFC subsystem maintainer to CC V5 -> V6: add entry-point length checks per Paolo Abeni's review V4 -> V5: fix whitespace damage V3 -> V4: add Fixes tags V2 -> V3: drop redundant checks from nfc_hci_msg_rx_work/nci_hci_msg_rx_work; remove incorrect Suggested-by tag V1 -> V2: use pskb_may_pull() instead of skb->len check v6: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260502163116.3409687-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com/ v5: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260416051522.4154698-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com/ v4: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/177614425081.3600288.2536320552978506086@gmail.com/ v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260413024329.3293075-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260409150825.2217133-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com/ v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260408223113.2009304-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com/ net/nfc/hci/core.c | 10 ++++++++++ net/nfc/nci/hci.c | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/nfc/hci/core.c b/net/nfc/hci/core.c index 0d33c81a15fe..ba6f0310ffd7 100644 --- a/net/nfc/hci/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/hci/core.c @@ -861,6 +861,11 @@ static void nfc_hci_recv_from_llc(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) struct sk_buff *frag_skb; int msg_len; + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NFC_HCI_HCP_PACKET_HEADER_LEN)) { + kfree_skb(skb); + return; + } + packet = (struct hcp_packet *)skb->data; if ((packet->header & ~NFC_HCI_FRAGMENT) == 0) { skb_queue_tail(&hdev->rx_hcp_frags, skb); @@ -904,6 +909,11 @@ static void nfc_hci_recv_from_llc(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) * unblock waiting cmd context. Otherwise, enqueue to dispatch * in separate context where handler can also execute command. */ + if (!pskb_may_pull(hcp_skb, NFC_HCI_HCP_HEADER_LEN)) { + kfree_skb(hcp_skb); + return; + } + packet = (struct hcp_packet *)hcp_skb->data; type = HCP_MSG_GET_TYPE(packet->message.header); if (type == NFC_HCI_HCP_RESPONSE) { diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c index 40ae8e5a7ec7..c03e8a0bd3bd 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c @@ -439,6 +439,11 @@ void nci_hci_data_received_cb(void *context, return; } + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, NCI_HCI_HCP_PACKET_HEADER_LEN)) { + kfree_skb(skb); + return; + } + packet = (struct nci_hcp_packet *)skb->data; if ((packet->header & ~NCI_HCI_FRAGMENT) == 0) { skb_queue_tail(&ndev->hci_dev->rx_hcp_frags, skb); @@ -482,6 +487,11 @@ void nci_hci_data_received_cb(void *context, * unblock waiting cmd context. Otherwise, enqueue to dispatch * in separate context where handler can also execute command. */ + if (!pskb_may_pull(hcp_skb, NCI_HCI_HCP_HEADER_LEN)) { + kfree_skb(hcp_skb); + return; + } + packet = (struct nci_hcp_packet *)hcp_skb->data; type = NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_TYPE(packet->message.header); if (type == NCI_HCI_HCP_RESPONSE) { -- 2.34.1