From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BFB30DECE; Tue, 5 May 2026 20:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778013677; cv=none; b=jx7Z7mveHk75PeB/2Xn21tn9n+EiJtPinI3A3qknc8pHgQTtJnWNIymYgNH6wSPQngnSfdx/2A+3iYE5QmGKGQ/j3QzOh8XjQcr35MMpW4RLiZtsDwwQh1IF61gl9mqLEILbPIZVXGWPvd7BmYuSZmlZDtkhWn/NNq4s5XhWLlY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778013677; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tXi/7g8m/ysWUdm1p0NQQETGqmM6FhhWlXa9/YPvUm4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Q9mdLzlPdHDv/FTNA661LfpATB2theVG56Xd1ykksb8K89J4kKQCyYUyZJj3Id/VKShqp1EpqpzV0k+W51sBgLkWdX2TwI99DJfga4UACJ2KnhVBZv+rv09mn6PuO/4ZZ0pzjzfJGcNrjRBZ2aZKq0aRQsXFUUGe4OarHYjH7ik= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oqt5A5Ne; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oqt5A5Ne" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9367C2BCB4; Tue, 5 May 2026 20:41:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778013677; bh=tXi/7g8m/ysWUdm1p0NQQETGqmM6FhhWlXa9/YPvUm4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oqt5A5NebI8mEoO2P4M/HE0oYDFPjHBmoZbohzpyf28JOUwlBdFgagEhXGH+kKqus Gic2mXjLKmpiqI2TOxVLEPjqmTgRZPEbBNcWvUI8MpGRADjQ2zXDi1OhJ4K9f9klNN hf0/jW7tjyEOfOkrLegUCLfITEMjPp5Ia+6g9/4qHjo3goG3UWtt7vWwTWwEioCXzK k+tRRfryl9QciqWABaK6pF29883oOiDSmZdcoiuAtFXCc7DZlvzl2LN/HbJ3s7+JjX /BQfQwCLw1FQoBydTYNRNv9/RICSjpgY9Ge559FZNI9JGj0QoCR3M6vI66+e24Vk4d FQDXk4UnNLi9Q== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gang Yan Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Abeni , stable@vger.kernel.org, MPTCP Linux , Matthieu Baerts Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 214/275] mptcp: sync the msk->sndbuf at accept() time Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 16:41:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20260505202943.6c1e41dadafd42d4b296c806f9ddd561@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <68c8f2a7-6149-4b65-bb1b-0ab4cd4067cf@kernel.org> References: <20260504135142.929052779@linuxfoundation.org> <20260504135151.022829547@linuxfoundation.org> <1bbeee9b-b69b-4be9-84ee-ddadda4793ef@kernel.org> <68c8f2a7-6149-4b65-bb1b-0ab4cd4067cf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 07:50:47PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > FYI, I quickly checked, and I noticed that 'subflow' is different on > v6.18 due to the "mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)" removed in > 68c7c3867145 ("mptcp: fix memcg accounting for passive sockets"). > > Moving __mptcp_propagate_sndbuf() a couple of lines above, before the > for-loop, should fix the issue. I can eventually look at sending a patch > with the fix. Dropped from the 6.18 queue, thanks. Happy to take a corrected 6.18-specific backport whenever you have one. -- Thanks, Sasha