From: Rion Kiguchi <kiguchi.r.sec@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org, Rion Kiguchi <kiguchi.r.sec@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] staging: vme_user: validate slave window size against buffer size
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 18:26:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260509092627.1136357-1-kiguchi.r.sec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026050935-designing-glancing-2e16@gregkh>
The VME_SET_SLAVE ioctl in drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_user.c accepts
a user-controlled slave.size and forwards it to vme_slave_set() without
comparing it against image[minor].size_buf. The slave-image kernel
buffer is allocated at probe time with a fixed size of PCI_BUF_SIZE
(0x20000 / 128 KiB), but the configured VME window size can be made
much larger via the ioctl.
The subsequent read() / write() handlers (vme_user_read /
vme_user_write) clamp the I/O range against vme_get_size(), which
returns the size the bridge driver has programmed for the window
(i.e. the attacker-supplied slave.size). vme_get_size() does not
consult size_buf, so an oversized window passes the existing bounds
checks, and buffer_to_user() / buffer_from_user() then index
image[minor].kern_buf with offsets beyond the actual allocation.
Result: a local user with read/write access to /dev/bus/vme/s* can
trigger out-of-bounds read and write of the kernel slab adjacent to
the slave-image buffer.
Fix: reject slave.size > size_buf in the VME_SET_SLAVE handler.
With this check in place, the existing bounds checks in
vme_user_read() / vme_user_write() against vme_get_size() are
sufficient to prevent OOB access; no additional checks in
buffer_to_user() / buffer_from_user() are needed.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
Signed-off-by: Rion Kiguchi <kiguchi.r.sec@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Drop redundant checks in buffer_to_user() / buffer_from_user();
the existing vme_get_size()-based bounds checks in vme_user_read()
/ vme_user_write() are sufficient once VME_SET_SLAVE rejects
oversized windows (Greg's review feedback)
- Reword commit message to explain why vme_get_size() does not
already catch this
Changes in v2:
- Use git send-email instead of Gmail web compose (v1 corrupted
the diff)
- Drop redundant Reported-by tag (author == reporter)
- Add Assisted-by tag per Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_user.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_user.c b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_user.c
index 11e25c2f6..64e95b026 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_user.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme_user.c
@@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ static int vme_user_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
return -EFAULT;
}
+ /*
+ * Reject window sizes larger than the kernel buffer
+ * allocated at probe time, otherwise subsequent
+ * read/write would access memory beyond kern_buf.
+ */
+ if (slave.size > image[minor].size_buf)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* XXX We do not want to push aspace, cycle and width
* to userspace as they are
*/
@@ -401,7 +409,7 @@ static int vme_user_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
slave.enable, slave.vme_addr, slave.size,
image[minor].pci_buf, slave.aspace,
slave.cycle);
-
+
break;
}
break;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 7:53 [PATCH] staging: vme_user: validate slave window size against buffer size Rion Kiguchi
2026-05-09 8:04 ` Greg KH
2026-05-09 9:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Rion Kiguchi
2026-05-09 9:15 ` Greg KH
2026-05-09 9:16 ` Greg KH
2026-05-09 9:26 ` Rion Kiguchi [this message]
2026-05-09 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260509092627.1136357-1-kiguchi.r.sec@gmail.com \
--to=kiguchi.r.sec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox