From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3373ACF15 for ; Sun, 10 May 2026 16:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778431447; cv=none; b=WI1ZL7K6bZmF0OtoHbrfQUZI+chm99v9eT0EABuuy/YvnNxW0UR2/wmq3TwnipuMHUFgh3sIy37GVSXBZ/7wNTwT1OJ2DIIUzsNNrgYJB9WYxsva4mlR5tM0Vgxb/wS2GTRk1MEmYo2tJ7o92ORdZ7IMiUg6vQe3P5um6KFq2FA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778431447; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uX8kb0V+bT5E5hP1yz6XP3+CY4ByVNUqAcjHEseNLj4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UOHQZzB4PEbzgNvnx1vRlzUMIf489Hcz8rmdqJxKhd+i939gWEJ74z0Nt/bGZ0/1B8UCRBd7w5EHLyOOTEE1534+c9C/bo6M8a+O+S6M0wCMylqZiLKE+8Hgi72HG6/5tsJWntHAwsxU9j495RiuwgkMQwbUUaxl0EBDs8q73Ps= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=lCvnYKBt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="lCvnYKBt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DBD6C2BCB8; Sun, 10 May 2026 16:44:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1778431447; bh=uX8kb0V+bT5E5hP1yz6XP3+CY4ByVNUqAcjHEseNLj4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lCvnYKBtwwksHqc641UHurEwnAnHLO4EbimQfEUK2rMF/6S3S4j19Su/mqRJp53yB v5DPPcX1gZDk6R3qD8NhNnt/9jRnObjpvmd6IGMD+DIyaTbDGMlpAnYfirD5icKkj/ NjLDV+mud51zLcL47zQUEx1uLqbX4YGsx1lvnGIk= Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 18:43:23 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Wentao Guan Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, jaltman@auristor.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com, sashal@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2 Message-ID: <2026051004-dreamless-dab-f7b0@gregkh> References: <2026051040-primary-anyway-9a79@gregkh> <20260510163636.260801-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260510163636.260801-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:36:36AM +0800, Wentao Guan wrote: > > Why is this needed? If you want this, please provide a working set of > > patches properly submitted, along with the reasoning why you just don't > > move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS > > filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why? > > FYI, there are bugfixes such as ("rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets") > affect the 6.1.y kernel, and the final goal is clean apply fixes for CVE-2026-43500 such as > ("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present") in maillist. That was not stated here at all, so we had no context :( If you need/want those bugfixes, great! Provide a patch series of them and we will be glad to review them. > > move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS > > filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why? > NO, just affected by compiled kernel which enabled the config:(, > we are preparing fix such as disable AFS and AF_RXRPC or fix it... Great, if you don't need this, disable it and then you don't need the backports either :) thanks, greg k-h