From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpbguseast3.qq.com (smtpbguseast3.qq.com [54.243.244.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1C8C32BF41 for ; Sun, 10 May 2026 16:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.243.244.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778431168; cv=none; b=j8KZVqYnc9wIq4Ss8jkwa+cv24PLBZRwj6g18sJiIEfLSFYNS7/jfSfjMxIO73BWvesFv+WKd0vP030ec4RiQE1a7Dfngkx807oCGeAHPY2JBSEz/UMUotStR1SueI0v3acXkZh6NNGvuIyDIFnQ7+OWvr7rUV0ShijGY1IeACA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778431168; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Odty7YJ7b8vxlfHfe6mj1Jd6dYMYqN2XdIVdOrFCJRM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=PWJm6jhXgH3WRLk7nnHbnLFePwyJUNJXE4qMykKQC2qMaW9+E8f/KFulMtbusbEHyW0+2imkgwRb8jgtAIVtAfJ4LhlwvyQyGfnu/oCY0CNo4uYhUWENquOLz78B43In5sAoaxcvL7Sqq+VUojpYhkE9BktTlHN6of+Q1uzC7fU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=uniontech.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uniontech.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uniontech.com header.i=@uniontech.com header.b=UCshBZsY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.243.244.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=uniontech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uniontech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uniontech.com header.i=@uniontech.com header.b="UCshBZsY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uniontech.com; s=onoh2408; t=1778431080; bh=sDFKyKYY+B11j/EB5MJf6LGn3swwcPl26xUwyvP3NuA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=UCshBZsYkAmeQQVyPK/6BMXyOV981YrqS3EkDZbpRDXBVQaY5kwyRjwSXmhiPUnv7 cilXoIxEIeNiT6UmTEdSiVc8Roa6b0/3cGu+pu2/iMS039UmVSehRsHV63Cdu5xyEu Y24gg6OG3Iyr6SREZfaGp89PQpNoaArsNix8e3dA= X-QQ-mid: zesmtpip4t1778431074tf8966068 X-QQ-Originating-IP: mIYvrhuV/dc5buPZWjvupFVUtSMIqNRG0y4cS1J8ZUc= Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [localhost]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Mon, 11 May 2026 00:37:52 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000 X-QQ-GoodBg: 1 X-BIZMAIL-ID: 7177602246040012836 EX-QQ-RecipientCnt: 11 From: Wentao Guan To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, guanwentao@uniontech.com, horms@kernel.org, jaltman@auristor.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com, sashal@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2 Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 00:36:36 +0800 Message-Id: <20260510163636.260801-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <2026051040-primary-anyway-9a79@gregkh> References: <2026051040-primary-anyway-9a79@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: zesmtpip:uniontech.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz3a-0 X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MVxUJtUPrfeCHs5AHRSUHqdBkyH5vrgM1dolChAMZTlaDassCsre2mwi oG8uVKVOXhURypnS+FYlkul757P+16usxhho281JtoZzzmJRHuFji73+vqqlxAR3GaBLFdR LpQCOZKAyiib7HfpZx/GeSSp8GZXaHWbW4HYjtmA+F3wmAJgqaE3U+bGs3ZUGrJAaFLouLE rKznfrWb4leRzfKcW8uFOV7zFLcNLMvMFh9ZNm1Sr1Z8w3BYMQt2dEaQjYs5x+S2C2VfAHQ 4PQxvnr/9Ojck1SonoSF7G6ULOEnqfZA44Lt235E0EgkLZswSFql7PhZOr2AXpzNTA6mkSB HyaALuyjw4hW9yb60wktKvB/wosbPOcq0c9M1RY8uIflm6CGQE5upIOB6tizy4e3Jk/XBYy PDo6jblE8+nbQudZbwoEm1JdmGONR4dlAJ8E9O9wDxGno1UPRq58zfIdrHJCyXNMj2Xw6CJ 1r2cNpIc9x7QjtrSxuOBsL5kbrCVv2o/tUuoDig/pB1v8CQnDWGnBhKWOkJQi+5HPVWYmRh FZ2PTwseiB6mF/Q6Y2G31DzaTEOI330XiZCggbD2I1WRZPMHRRlhMhDQJwPoiTNLK3TOhtG A4mVtLBD6LovRHhuAEY9Ncwp5uTpdF+5qOusmU5RuAtxhYW4kqlX/rqmqL6rtUQcJiVHt9x bImFDg53EB0sF/fjS6nn4qy+Mc1VEdH0gmRfdfz+TJQ+Q11GxLp3aNWCgx7TXXsEAF34Jl+ CU6D9rqNG9PYKZ/WUnDvc5szCDU+Vlh8zodn5TiQtZVI1vdEBJw6yATBzXL/D+Y2aIAyGwy ypj2qvIdWdv7XGfEnTRYeX3Cbk/OGRYVqd1aC3IFe0Nfx2nwb+Wf9Gwd5JlctwUVvu+ZOAw Tbu1wlKvoo+R4yWbYiXLtrImaPqVqU1dN9EojfpN2RuHDN0SX4gALDykadm69D8GaL6kyXC 28nUnDNBzQlxFULtcses49iXV1eRnIfMWrJLIYgNGtdwacdNSIhfokXzlOGJDXuZc566BFB 2zuliiV2RcDVoqedoxqsQs2376tMVzoDycXDQEYg== X-QQ-XMRINFO: OWPUhxQsoeAVwkVaQIEGSKwwgKCxK/fD5g== X-QQ-RECHKSPAM: 0 > Why is this needed? If you want this, please provide a working set of > patches properly submitted, along with the reasoning why you just don't > move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS > filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why? FYI, there are bugfixes such as ("rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets") affect the 6.1.y kernel, and the final goal is clean apply fixes for CVE-2026-43500 such as ("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present") in maillist. > move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS > filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why? NO, just affected by compiled kernel which enabled the config:(, we are preparing fix such as disable AFS and AF_RXRPC or fix it... BRs Wentao Guan