From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FEB226CE32 for ; Sun, 10 May 2026 16:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778429902; cv=none; b=dUp7fmAYWm1h49oyT0jP4IulEMdu/GWKR/vg4b1rgX3jasqVbKOWxQV4QOyyzwSB4oeha2151hB8Sq7/f6vwo+IkmscmMRAmbqFORi161R6QtiKhsfD9W91WLZzQob/UF30T2zq3TxttgKA94+0pJGe0I9uaaq33RZ4Hwx07UV8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778429902; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I3TDPWqvlVx9Tm/jPh/j7sv0fgPy7Hc5eWjFKrBZVAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=R4FshTxv9Y0o4rwvWlhkK4L8U4wcfq+upH+xqNCCRYRhRGvE9TxWI5AxDyO0NCGEPHzlHXdD3YBqdzWfpY8mX/fHpYl7DEcx8+42M5EQRM3s855fiWxxFRiyUOpzy2Bgkmba42HFpnz14lgvVdGdxi4YwShzOI1H1Y31Wij0X4w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Y1uhwhoy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Y1uhwhoy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BBECC2BCB8; Sun, 10 May 2026 16:18:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1778429902; bh=I3TDPWqvlVx9Tm/jPh/j7sv0fgPy7Hc5eWjFKrBZVAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y1uhwhoyshBT9UwHH6NOrrulf2OcophTyP43wqCmXCs5SRmb/vqr76WXADpdaGFkL zsa9pLeqA+qz2Lt/fJDzn4eViktTa2/6MAQQcXGWoMvoMhE7AsxjbpW14LS+qYU9ko UzuH8I32OFCTk1OkKtQVgEE/EhTNvx88scQfm8b4= Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 18:17:38 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Wentao Guan Cc: sashal@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, jaltman@auristor.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, marc.dionne@auristor.com, stable@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2 Message-ID: <2026051040-primary-anyway-9a79@gregkh> References: <939b8e49da80ebac-sashal@kernel.org> <20260509200157.191683-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260509200157.191683-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 04:01:57AM +0800, Wentao Guan wrote: > Hello All, > > FYI, I found the commit list from v6.1..v6.2 mainline, with the refactor RXRPC > commit list, it will possible for v6.1.172 to clean apply for the becoming fix > patches for AF_RXRPC in higher kernel version, but it a bit large... Why is this needed? If you want this, please provide a working set of patches properly submitted, along with the reasoning why you just don't move to a newer kernel version. And do you really use the AFS filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree? If so, why? thanks, greg k-h