From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012DC4D8CE for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 00:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778545107; cv=none; b=nk+L1r6iqAAKfJBj3Q8hmSK8FhhU2o7yChxC5T5SM2h5TonTr0LBPt+LBoSzJHyzqirA9rCvuc11XuX9RrUG44hcyP4rsLz1jydmqv+Atppu2JGwQOB6ymQHd1/FH1s12b0Iqna0KR0LeNU7Fm+hxUa6wyYjTSGX7mA3dxQsuZw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778545107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8V4gNaR/m0NUamH9mTAaMyli4FjffIa1hXkz3kSG284=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=DpWPuzwGJ+QIo621HjrNM3StdLkYeGqiSrjuqfxfZ5LUEjeziML3keWw8GS0W4bLaaWu5QaEi4CVd80YMOn9EEyA7edhWfCkzBXopbMfL/X1kwsYlppXQFYXFJrNjZdXGUjFQO4RYJ3G+m9q5cDayIcTURfE7VFQnBrqaLMs7VE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EktVZkIk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EktVZkIk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77059C2BCB0; Tue, 12 May 2026 00:18:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778545106; bh=8V4gNaR/m0NUamH9mTAaMyli4FjffIa1hXkz3kSG284=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EktVZkIk1PJGr1EFL1r0O9fB5Exjbhc43nrv7HSAFcoB1ysi4EUKGtPHavKAtoaS6 EgXA68RLixyzF60Pmjmr28YFcQYeeHjqXFyquM0TaltJ4Im0xXBFPUcbgSWpKzmcdc I0v0YviBU2baYlIgydmq7b4V7U/mk326OQ/kP2wNTfR351XF61n1DsnPNMevQmwykQ POi5tgS4OHYIwz7U9/z6KtYI3MO+Q8kQejmFrF4mda1YY1arnv5Ph68s/gIyOJygz3 NxCdYjKbZ48cMRANEFrVUNzzyLfEUmDBW5nonb1vbu3xt0vyS4L3GiXfoqE0A4+f+9 J64PBCDKIhk9w== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sasha Levin , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Shung-Hsi Yu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Eduard Zingerman , Andrii Nakryiko , Tao Lyu , Levi Zim , Paul Chaignon Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 00/10] bpf: fix precision backtracking instruction iteration Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 20:17:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20260511220000.stable-reply-item002@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Paul Chaignon wrote: > This patchset backports commit 41f6f64e6999 ("bpf: support non-r10 > register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking") again, but > this time with the subsequent commits that improved the efficiency of > the verifier. In addition, the last two commits fix and test a > regression that was later found in commit 41f6f64e6999. Queued for 6.6, thanks. I also separately picked up 69772f509e08 ("bpf: Don't mark STACK_INVALID as STACK_MISC in mark_stack_slot_misc") as a follow-up to patch 3/10 (eaf18febd6eb). -- Thanks, Sasha