From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8C1347C7 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 00:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778545108; cv=none; b=ga9X7iSgwjbDMdud/CQYgUwmcmP7xE+PWJN4gbPjsZ2YBVNgOLu3bzPPwGjbRTnVcmi9nAbpZSu1tcl3XoLqqNmgIvZEl3dF3VQYL1ODaHNziSAbSDPvj3GqheAb1Hi8yAKTT7QzXcwpBTqFgOrV9vE9p/gK8deOy4/rlPGJiKc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778545108; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xlxm7trPNs58hoQC/yGdtOJSu/zrYBWRWL6bQOYrsaw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=C4+FL3zCN4Z444+ioRdu2IwqtC9ZddLlvxtg2tBztVHoYRePwibaYPEu+9TI1dilSGl+nZQn4uvKcztUBe1YX6ztkensMVuOnDk3LaoPrMXRMIudbpQ+j3wvLEClU38y6n/NcYNYkvfiSeu9GpLBUbyapuj3EWJVJF4TWBYegpc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lbSCHJno; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lbSCHJno" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCBF5C2BCF5; Tue, 12 May 2026 00:18:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778545108; bh=xlxm7trPNs58hoQC/yGdtOJSu/zrYBWRWL6bQOYrsaw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lbSCHJnoMaOhbr8MuLUfAs7bZxpUjvqLaC0tA3uj1KIwh2He6WqcM/geVBk/mrrlj vIBkTevP9SazB4POZsrWZyurndeh/WGM6DP9zZIORLE7kuEteaWR04Ntd4p5Ag+T5z 6mFilP0Eaclf73162a/r+3K0ZFNGhADbfuQJuaZeRwdim8G7wAmKMtQtDftLZz6PIs 3fHF2J33K8CFYULZ09klSKXcBFOgL9xww4mLwB9UZHcOhL3RY1aD1RooENs6jUIRfu Vmfx3/7TEUdHrF7afxk4U84Da27I6g026fn0vmGdnqx/vkCr8pUAkwhxLXFcEeXmRk RPyq8n7vM7CfA== From: Sasha Levin To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Sasha Levin , dhowells@redhat.com, guanwentao@uniontech.com, imv4bel@gmail.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Marc Dionne , Jeffrey Altman , Simon Horman , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , Harshit Mogalapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y v3 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 20:17:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20260511220000.stable-reply-item003@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260511074104.60836-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> References: <20260511074104.60836-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 03:41:04PM +0800, Wentao Guan wrote: > (cherry picked from commit 24481a7f573305706054c59e275371f8d0fe919f) > [Readd rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy which missed in 016725807ce3 in v6.12.86] > Stable-dep-of: aa54b1d27fe0 ("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when > paged frags are present") Queued for 6.12 (both 1/2 and 2/2), thanks. I fixed up the bracket annotation at apply time per Harshit's review: the trace event was actually dropped in bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure"), not 016725807ce3, so the queued changelog references bf20f46d94f1. -- Thanks, Sasha