Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	error27@gmail.com, luka.gejak@linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB write and read in HT_caps_handler and OnAssocRsp
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 14:35:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026051157-dictate-traverse-684c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505172214.3650398-1-hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 07:22:12PM +0200, Alexandru Hossu wrote:
> v4, addressing the sashiko review comments on v3.
> 
> Regarding your questions:
> 
> The two patches to drop from your tree are the ones applied from v2:
> 
>   41a866092f09 ("staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB write in HT_caps_handler()")

I have no such git id in my tree, where is this coming from?


>   e36c54247447 ("staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB read in OnAssocRsp() IE loop")

Same here, where is that git id in my tree?  What branch?

totally confused.

> v4 supersedes both.

What happened to v3?

> Regarding hardware: I do not have rtl8723bs hardware available.  The
> patches are derived from reading the code, cross-checking against the
> 802.11 spec, and comparing against the existing HT_info_handler() guard
> pattern in the same file.
> 
> What changed in v4:
> 
> Patch 1 (HT_caps_handler):
>   The v3 umin() loop bounded the write side correctly, but three macros
>   that run after the loop access pIE->data[0] and pIE->data[1]
>   unconditionally.  If pIE->length is 0 or 1 those reads go out of
>   bounds.  Added if (pIE->length < 2) return; placed after
>   HT_caps_enable = 1 so that HT negotiation is not regressed.
> 
> Patch 2 (OnAssocRsp):
>   Two additional issues found by sashiko:
>   - The fixed-field reads (capability, status, AID) at
>     pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + {0,2,4} run without any minimum frame
>     length check.  Added if (pkt_len < WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + 6) return _FAIL.
>   - The WMM OUI comparison (memcmp of 6 bytes) ran without checking
>     pIE->length >= 6.  An IE with length < 6 at the end of the packet
>     caused the memcmp to read into adjacent frame data.  Added
>     pIE->length >= 6 guard.

what changed in the previous versions?  You have to list them all.

And you have 3 different sets of patches I see, why is this not all one
big series?  What is the order of these different sets?

really really confused now...

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260428091621.739680-1-hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
2026-04-28  9:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB write in HT_caps_handler() Alexandru Hossu
2026-04-28 10:17   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-28  9:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB read in OnAssocRsp() IE loop Alexandru Hossu
2026-04-28 10:17   ` Luka Gejak
2026-05-05 17:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB write and read in HT_caps_handler and OnAssocRsp Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-05 17:22   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB write and read in HT_caps_handler() Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-05 17:22   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB reads in OnAssocRsp() IE parsing Alexandru Hossu
2026-05-11 12:35   ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-05-11 12:36   ` [PATCH v4 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB write and read in HT_caps_handler and OnAssocRsp Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026051157-dictate-traverse-684c@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=hossu.alexandru@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox