Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: nicholas@carlini.com,axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 16:41:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026052036-abiding-paper-2842@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x d6a2d7b04b5a093021a7a0e2e69e9d5237dfa8cc
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026052036-abiding-paper-2842@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From d6a2d7b04b5a093021a7a0e2e69e9d5237dfa8cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Carlini <nicholas@carlini.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 18:02:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in
 io_wq_remove_pending()

io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq->hash_tail[] if the cancelled
work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether
the preceding entry in acct->work_list has the same hash value, but
never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash()
is simply atomic_read(&work->flags) >> IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash
bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a
hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list
predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed
io_kiocb is stored in wq->hash_tail[0].

Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in
io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer
is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and
is freed back to req_cachep, wq->hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The
io_wq is per-task (tctx->io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the
dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed
bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and
wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory.

Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor
never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 204361a77f40 ("io-wq: fix hang after cancelling pending hashed work")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Carlini <nicholas@carlini.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index 7a9f94a0ce6f..8cc7b47d3089 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -1124,7 +1124,8 @@ static inline void io_wq_remove_pending(struct io_wq *wq,
 	if (io_wq_is_hashed(work) && work == wq->hash_tail[hash]) {
 		if (prev)
 			prev_work = container_of(prev, struct io_wq_work, list);
-		if (prev_work && io_get_work_hash(prev_work) == hash)
+		if (prev_work && io_wq_is_hashed(prev_work) &&
+		    io_get_work_hash(prev_work) == hash)
 			wq->hash_tail[hash] = prev_work;
 		else
 			wq->hash_tail[hash] = NULL;


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-20 14:41 gregkh [this message]
2026-05-20 14:46 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026052036-abiding-paper-2842@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=nicholas@carlini.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox