From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEE635675F; Fri, 22 May 2026 13:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779455565; cv=none; b=JjHL+HhhF9jXacCifky/wPq66E881kVTxqi+beB8nUVsQaANPLrQDARuuyMKnlVsnt6Sg39bkzxTNLsrQ3GB4936WFJvKZgnHKPbpwBnofo8RSVFvjv6cLy6Wmx2rNG5uVDRHBBhvk4weAibNT09y/WnDLIwVUmTMeDHEgpnwmw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779455565; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xHP99JOSb7QXdOdGYHj8nJnQwp268iIMFoEmZ1tmNZs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IcYXhpqNGlrw0ExsMBo8BQecWlrX+CGkKQD9LgnCIF6LQg8k5que3GpSiB1aGiTFaYWf4aEtVdOmjL64xt8z7WvNxJwGmmlzfrwY/DIRvgtHn1Y4kiQyokfXUBVFuA2O3kWTSE9CMVbEyazcz8xVYU/EN86MMK7LWxYRDelHaw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OLtxUYmM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OLtxUYmM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B9901F000E9; Fri, 22 May 2026 13:12:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779455564; bh=xHP99JOSb7QXdOdGYHj8nJnQwp268iIMFoEmZ1tmNZs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=OLtxUYmMZY0TnFtclx7kgoRGfX/ERw6VL6tZbcUEh5Nc4yPnahQCPB8xiwQjeF+bU KKGikSBu26knMFZZRQjZMVaaG9qAQInyeaXHke6UjtJZcYIWyPmPl5qD2ybupiMq29 GWY5FQftWcvKidivgEWkV4jh9SQYf7w+A484UgzffOmTs6zIIm18B3b/7mhLLTWNza 1Wwzgn1O1cBGAQJBITKCXwxHYeVueOTiPMG3MsuSyhM3J+3mL0PKdke1yqof4SRPWw +mDth16krBOcbwZFSz1eQI0B+ZaOLZ6pxkAwhpEMAHS47NT0w+tyWH/aLrpWtl2c9W yMMtDYDu8+a4g== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sasha Levin , patches@lists.linux.dev, Song Liu , Puranjay Mohan , Pu Lehui , Paul Chaignon , Alexei Starovoitov , Harshit Mogalapalli Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 346/666] bpf, riscv: Remove redundant bpf_flush_icache() after pack allocator finalize Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 09:12:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20260522123641.rc-drop-46ee1342b887@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20260520162111.222830634@linuxfoundation.org> <20260520162118.730164877@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 03:27:13PM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote: > Upstream doesn't have this problem because this call is removed in > commit: 6798668ab195 ("riscv, bpf: Remove duplicated > bpf_flush_icache()") but this is not present in 6.12.91 so I think it is > incorrect to backport this, should we drop this ? Dropped from the 6.12 and 6.6 queues — 6.6 has the same missing prerequisite. Thanks for the report. -- Thanks, Sasha