From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Lukas Beckmann <lbckmnn@mailbox.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y 0/3] backport missing dependencies of d66792919d4f
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 08:09:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260524-stable-item004-reply@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522213120.1205100-1-lbckmnn@mailbox.org>
> Commit d66792919d4f ("sched/deadline: Use revised wakeup rule for
> dl_server") in the 6.12.y stable tree (upstream commit 14a857056466)
> depends on three upstream commits that were not backported:
>
> commit cccb45d7c429 ("sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling")
> commit 4ae8d9aa9f9d ("sched/deadline: Fix dl_server getting stuck")
> commit a3a70caf7906 ("sched/deadline: Fix dl_server behaviour")
Thanks for tracking this down. Before I queue this, the series is
missing two more follow-up fixes that both carry "Fixes: cccb45d7c429"
and that are needed for the dl_server logic to behave correctly:
4717432dfd99 ("sched/deadline: Fix dl_server_stopped()")
bb4700adc3ab ("sched/deadline: Always stop dl-server before changing parameters")
Without 4717432dfd99 the dl_server_stopped() check is inverted (it
returns the wrong polarity after cccb45d7c429), and without
bb4700adc3ab the per-rq running_bw accounting can get out of sync when
dl-server parameters change while it is still active.
Could you send a v2 that includes both follow-ups on top of the
existing three? Then this should be safe to apply as a whole.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 21:31 [PATCH 6.12.y 0/3] backport missing dependencies of d66792919d4f Lukas Beckmann
2026-05-22 21:31 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] sched/deadline: Less agressive dl_server handling Lukas Beckmann
2026-05-22 21:31 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] sched/deadline: Fix dl_server getting stuck Lukas Beckmann
2026-05-22 21:31 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/3] sched/deadline: Fix dl_server behaviour Lukas Beckmann
2026-05-24 12:09 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-05-25 21:09 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 0/3] backport missing dependencies of d66792919d4f Lukas Beckmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260524-stable-item004-reply@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lbckmnn@mailbox.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox