Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Kacper Kokot <kacper.kokot.44@gmail.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 10:31:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526103102.003aedd9@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b82e4092-1f4e-40ca-b117-31c062ea54c2@suse.de>

On Tue, 26 May 2026 00:08:15 +0200
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de> wrote:

> On 5/25/26 11:28 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Kacper Kokot <kacper.kokot.44@gmail.com> wrote:  
> >> Padding TCP options with NOPs is optional, so it is legal to send an
> >> MSS option that is not aligned to a word boundary and therefore not
> >> aligned for checksum calculation. The current TCPMSS target is not
> >> robust to this: when the MSS option is unaligned it produces an
> >> invalid checksum, and the packet is dropped.  
> > 
> > Is this an actual, real world bug?  This code is 20+ years old, all that
> > this hints at is that they are always aligned in reality?
> >   
> 
> AFAICS, these issues are not present in real environments as MSS option 
> is placed at the beginning of the options block making it aligned by 
> default usually.
> 
> I would say this is more for correctness. I wonder, if we are touching 
> this code, we could use the opportunity to make it use 
> get_unaligned_be16() instead.

gcc and clang convert x[0] << 8 | x[1] (etc) to the appropriate single
instruction (and maybe byteswap) on cpu that support misaligned accesses.
So there is little to gain from doing it any other way.

-- David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-26  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 20:11 [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned Kacper Kokot
2026-05-25 21:28 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-25 21:44   ` Kacper Kokot
2026-05-25 22:08   ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-05-26  9:31     ` David Laight [this message]
2026-05-26 13:50 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-26 15:18   ` David Laight
2026-05-26 16:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-26 23:21   ` Kacper Kokot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260526103102.003aedd9@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kacper.kokot.44@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox