Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: wangjiexun2025@gmail.com,bird@lzu.edu.cn,jannh@google.com,luiz.von.dentz@intel.com,n05ec@lzu.edu.cn,tomapufckgml@gmail.com,yifanwucs@gmail.com,yuantan098@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 09:52:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026052843-prankish-sharpener-ccb5@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e83f5e24da741fa9405aeeff00b08c5ee7c37b88
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026052843-prankish-sharpener-ccb5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From e83f5e24da741fa9405aeeff00b08c5ee7c37b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiexun Wang <wangjiexun2025@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 19:43:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access

bt_sock_poll() walks the accept queue without synchronization, while
child teardown can unlink the same socket and drop its last reference.
The unsynchronized accept queue walk has existed since the initial
Bluetooth import.

Protect accept_q with a dedicated lock for queue updates and polling.
Also rework bt_accept_dequeue() to take temporary child references under
the queue lock before dropping it and locking the child socket.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reported-by: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Yifan Wu <yifanwucs@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Juefei Pu <tomapufckgml@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Xin Liu <bird@lzu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jiexun Wang <wangjiexun2025@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ren Wei <n05ec@lzu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jiexun Wang <wangjiexun2025@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>

diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
index 69eed69f7f26..3faea66b1979 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
@@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ void baswap(bdaddr_t *dst, const bdaddr_t *src);
 struct bt_sock {
 	struct sock sk;
 	struct list_head accept_q;
+	spinlock_t accept_q_lock; /* protects accept_q */
 	struct sock *parent;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	void (*skb_msg_name)(struct sk_buff *, void *, int *);
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
index 33d053d63407..9d68dd86023c 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ struct sock *bt_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 
 	sock_init_data(sock, sk);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q);
+	spin_lock_init(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q_lock);
 
 	sock_reset_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
 
@@ -214,6 +215,7 @@ void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk, bool bh)
 {
 	const struct cred *old_cred;
 	struct pid *old_pid;
+	struct bt_sock *par = bt_sk(parent);
 
 	BT_DBG("parent %p, sk %p", parent, sk);
 
@@ -224,9 +226,13 @@ void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk, bool bh)
 	else
 		lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 
-	list_add_tail(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q);
 	bt_sk(sk)->parent = parent;
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&par->accept_q_lock);
+	list_add_tail(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q, &par->accept_q);
+	sk_acceptq_added(parent);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&par->accept_q_lock);
+
 	/* Copy credentials from parent since for incoming connections the
 	 * socket is allocated by the kernel.
 	 */
@@ -244,8 +250,6 @@ void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk, bool bh)
 		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
 	else
 		release_sock(sk);
-
-	sk_acceptq_added(parent);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_enqueue);
 
@@ -254,45 +258,72 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_enqueue);
  */
 void bt_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk)
 {
+	struct sock *parent = bt_sk(sk)->parent;
+
 	BT_DBG("sk %p state %d", sk, sk->sk_state);
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&bt_sk(parent)->accept_q_lock);
 	list_del_init(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q);
-	sk_acceptq_removed(bt_sk(sk)->parent);
+	sk_acceptq_removed(parent);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bt_sk(parent)->accept_q_lock);
 	bt_sk(sk)->parent = NULL;
 	sock_put(sk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_unlink);
 
+static struct sock *bt_accept_get(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct bt_sock *bt = bt_sk(parent);
+	struct sock *next = NULL;
+
+	/* accept_q is modified from child teardown paths too, so take a
+	 * temporary reference before dropping the queue lock.
+	 */
+	spin_lock_bh(&bt->accept_q_lock);
+
+	if (sk) {
+		if (bt_sk(sk)->parent != parent)
+			goto out;
+
+		if (!list_is_last(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q, &bt->accept_q)) {
+			next = &list_next_entry(bt_sk(sk), accept_q)->sk;
+			sock_hold(next);
+		}
+	} else if (!list_empty(&bt->accept_q)) {
+		next = &list_first_entry(&bt->accept_q,
+					 struct bt_sock, accept_q)->sk;
+		sock_hold(next);
+	}
+
+out:
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bt->accept_q_lock);
+	return next;
+}
+
 struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock)
 {
-	struct bt_sock *s, *n;
-	struct sock *sk;
+	struct sock *sk, *next;
 
 	BT_DBG("parent %p", parent);
 
 restart:
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(s, n, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q, accept_q) {
-		sk = (struct sock *)s;
-
+	for (sk = bt_accept_get(parent, NULL); sk; sk = next) {
 		/* Prevent early freeing of sk due to unlink and sock_kill */
-		sock_hold(sk);
 		lock_sock(sk);
 
 		/* Check sk has not already been unlinked via
 		 * bt_accept_unlink() due to serialisation caused by sk locking
 		 */
-		if (!bt_sk(sk)->parent) {
+		if (bt_sk(sk)->parent != parent) {
 			BT_DBG("sk %p, already unlinked", sk);
 			release_sock(sk);
 			sock_put(sk);
 
-			/* Restart the loop as sk is no longer in the list
-			 * and also avoid a potential infinite loop because
-			 * list_for_each_entry_safe() is not thread safe.
-			 */
 			goto restart;
 		}
 
+		next = bt_accept_get(parent, sk);
+
 		/* sk is safely in the parent list so reduce reference count */
 		sock_put(sk);
 
@@ -310,6 +341,8 @@ restart:
 				sock_graft(sk, newsock);
 
 			release_sock(sk);
+			if (next)
+				sock_put(next);
 			return sk;
 		}
 
@@ -518,18 +551,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_sock_stream_recvmsg);
 
 static inline __poll_t bt_accept_poll(struct sock *parent)
 {
-	struct bt_sock *s, *n;
+	struct bt_sock *bt = bt_sk(parent);
+	struct bt_sock *s;
 	struct sock *sk;
+	__poll_t mask = 0;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&bt->accept_q_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(s, &bt->accept_q, accept_q) {
+		int state;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(s, n, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q, accept_q) {
 		sk = (struct sock *)s;
-		if (sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECTED ||
-		    (test_bit(BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP, &bt_sk(parent)->flags) &&
-		     sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT2))
-			return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
-	}
+		state = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_state);
 
-	return 0;
+		if (state == BT_CONNECTED ||
+		    (test_bit(BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP, &bt->flags) &&
+		     state == BT_CONNECT2)) {
+			mask = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bt->accept_q_lock);
+
+	return mask;
 }
 
 __poll_t bt_sock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026052843-prankish-sharpener-ccb5@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bird@lzu.edu.cn \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=luiz.von.dentz@intel.com \
    --cc=n05ec@lzu.edu.cn \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomapufckgml@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangjiexun2025@gmail.com \
    --cc=yifanwucs@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuantan098@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox