From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F0C3E1682; Fri, 29 May 2026 12:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780058654; cv=none; b=d8JSLxzUX7o+FZsQ4fpq65HJ6RGg4N0yvrKTEx12LMLSgziOo52bFkgZr0kmtgYSq8JfIDUDn33GVkmhij3etQrVchr5lK/P6HUKXVRORjNd4EBBhmTlnWfsIxRxnLMe4omki1mGDb/NN5AeFuwrF8wSaHxR7hqy0ND3vX4j5zw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780058654; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fydvVjAVH3DpTajNCPdBLazp9UBSP9CcGOVs/7y7MoU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=MmbI8QZYxZRbcEtY3LvU1OZtYwsB/1OL8cNtfqOcVAqsdtyDNBzor2CBaYDP1YYNZ/2sqnp6dMqmTLafte9k6h5EhP6tlPZTy+lgDKYFkpgH16ATPSpTx73+PTPP3GA10Y8TZ12n6IMWVGjGHD2kSmwS9QI+PtbhNzu2Y6LNIhM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=U8WWKG0j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="U8WWKG0j" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C89E11F0089A; Fri, 29 May 2026 12:44:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780058653; bh=fydvVjAVH3DpTajNCPdBLazp9UBSP9CcGOVs/7y7MoU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=U8WWKG0jeIR6rUgaEri6hTUz3bR8Xk6PLCeTGm4auIhwl6sIQ7RKJovP25vLeLHbr iDzce+EUF6qYXyxrk+6Pdq2lrl9YBLyBFN3MpXakauENvJz7Y7ZPMjLDMod3aaTsoC PWl9279p44VBvXHEIwHvFF4O/BKpGNEAxoAH+CvgBpNrgOxtkYAeEGWC57YNkTsWi8 J62QNmT0AhRwls0wuWuTWLcQpDki8oxrJccdpLHQUwluLfnKILRU7UX8j4Vjvci6Ta iOUYFkhjUyJ9eI8rsy20Xm4+T5He1lO6mH5U0CTmYly/boNikD0h5PhNXS6KMyrc0p fVKpOxxs0N5FA== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Johannes Thumshirn , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Daniel Vacek Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 299/377] btrfs: dont search back for dir inode item in INO_LOOKUP_USER Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 08:44:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20260529120000.btrfs-inolookup-keep@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20260528194638.371537336@linuxfoundation.org> <20260528194647.015775177@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 08:39:10AM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: > This is not a bugfix, rather, it is a cleanup. > Even though it's kinda small and limited to a single function, I'm not > sure it's worth the stable backport. > Is there any specific reason you picked this patch? You're right that it's a cleanup on its own. It wasn't selected as a standalone backport - it was pulled in as a dependency (it carries Stable-dep-of: 1e92637722ae "btrfs: check for subvolume before deleting squota qgroup") so that the squota qgroup fix applies cleanly. -- Thanks, Sasha