From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Create wrapper to walk PCI config space
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 13:03:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530170331.3037528-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530170331.3037528-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit b0631f8a5740c55b52d02174cc4c9c84cc7a16a1 ]
Combine three PCI config space walkers — intel_vsec_walk_dvsec(),
intel_vsec_walk_vsec(), and intel_vsec_walk_header() — into a new wrapper
function, intel_vsec_feature_walk(). This refactoring simplifies the probe
logic and lays the groundwork for future patches that will loop over these
calls. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250703022832.1302928-4-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Stable-dep-of: 348ccc754d89 ("platform/x86/intel/vsec: Fix enable_cnt imbalance on PCIe error recovery")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
index 1a9f8267b0b07..e31e5db593401 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c
@@ -376,11 +376,35 @@ static bool intel_vsec_walk_vsec(struct pci_dev *pdev,
return have_devices;
}
+static bool intel_vsec_get_features(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+ struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info)
+{
+ bool found = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Both DVSEC and VSEC capabilities can exist on the same device,
+ * so both intel_vsec_walk_dvsec() and intel_vsec_walk_vsec() must be
+ * called independently. Additionally, intel_vsec_walk_header() is
+ * needed for devices that do not have VSEC/DVSEC but provide the
+ * information via device_data.
+ */
+ if (intel_vsec_walk_dvsec(pdev, info))
+ found = true;
+
+ if (intel_vsec_walk_vsec(pdev, info))
+ found = true;
+
+ if (info && (info->quirks & VSEC_QUIRK_NO_DVSEC) &&
+ intel_vsec_walk_header(pdev, info))
+ found = true;
+
+ return found;
+}
+
static int intel_vsec_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
struct intel_vsec_platform_info *info;
struct vsec_priv *priv;
- bool have_devices = false;
int ret;
ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
@@ -399,17 +423,7 @@ static int intel_vsec_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id
priv->info = info;
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
- if (intel_vsec_walk_dvsec(pdev, info))
- have_devices = true;
-
- if (intel_vsec_walk_vsec(pdev, info))
- have_devices = true;
-
- if (info && (info->quirks & VSEC_QUIRK_NO_DVSEC) &&
- intel_vsec_walk_header(pdev, info))
- have_devices = true;
-
- if (!have_devices)
+ if (!intel_vsec_get_features(pdev, info))
return -ENODEV;
return 0;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 7:46 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Fix enable_cnt imbalance on PCIe" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-30 17:03 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add private data for per-device data Sasha Levin
2026-05-30 17:03 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-05-30 17:03 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/4] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Make driver_data info const Sasha Levin
2026-05-30 17:03 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 4/4] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Fix enable_cnt imbalance on PCIe error recovery Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260530170331.3037528-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox