From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4291D5160; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 02:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780279894; cv=none; b=CJsURy1WZChgbWi6d+e2FZU2CxRbKK1IA2axdjhXScLnF37vEBveQX0xdY4LhJk1zQrN6ImqzioPRGVZ2teKMvFUk2TR17hrhTaLpJVVcOrSC8Y+hnGN1DnVA0Zgv5XxIf6Wkjs+lNNn7FOqscy45ivm4HGoYo68dWnXDymHZH8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780279894; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z0X8ECxyJvOkM5nccMTpeR65nfHis5uykHGw0CXbfow=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=jDEmiSDkHH0pK4ga7ZROE6cRWyC9uuU7i0GWXYRQOBWg8Bx/M+G9RM9NsTIH3/NZb10r+N9+o9m6I4AQUHpwz/aeLktekp1f91BG2xNupry65lv96hnLFQqdxg4loBy6/opyC9B0QLn35EEXb69K/cTrHfxJk0FgkZmltYAbrwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UO+XxBhQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UO+XxBhQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF87D1F00893; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 02:11:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780279893; bh=Z0X8ECxyJvOkM5nccMTpeR65nfHis5uykHGw0CXbfow=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=UO+XxBhQVHJKP0VUMeQX1zGtsd5O/DQQVcZMvJSkHgUutcUQC69TGTRgn1Ns3d/87 iwH4jJZkZ+EZPimSB2Se/JVhn7Jyvz9rIq2YqhsfvBjuSktvWjf5dY051l5t/pjJTD Ph9hLIIEVek5wGhN80IQrbQ5jYtlzNXt9DnXSeFUZdbXcr9P328bWyOWud/csNIsC8 2uSSKgLZDidbvLJCBlQ89FRxYD+HB0bfp1xtj8eornVlCLKikgDoLJGZCHZUzcOn2X 7LuS5q+trXjDqP5Rfez5akRN3xiO54DOe9EFKdQCT45NKZ/ijTN4kYjIn1so5hUdyP DtzBT2+a7ye7A== From: Sasha Levin To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sasha Levin , patches@lists.linux.dev, Steffen Klassert , Florian Westphal , Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 027/589] xfrm: Wait for RCU readers during policy netns exit Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 22:11:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20260601015021.rc-xfrm-netns-exit@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <56652caf63e8db874a3ebd761ec134c003d4986c.camel@decadent.org.uk> References: <20260530160224.570625122@linuxfoundation.org> <20260530160225.295450347@linuxfoundation.org> <56652caf63e8db874a3ebd761ec134c003d4986c.camel@decadent.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, 2026-05-30 at 21:45 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is broken - it needs commit 3e5241731847 "xfrm: move policy_bydst > RCU sync from per-netns .exit to .pre_exit" as a further fix. > > I haven't checked whether that applies cleanly or needs backporting > work. I've dropped this from the 5.10, 5.15 and 6.1 queues; I'll (try to) re-queue it together with the backported follow-up. Thanks for the catch. -- Thanks, Sasha