From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57FA940F8CC for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781191596; cv=none; b=GvaS1nyLT7gb/p7fVC7hZ8BuJqjEgAIeeg3wEdMtJutTvylQWftAS3QHVHNlYy9gp6o0X+QJBmZnAnaYMrmYahW6pVuccH0ej7LUprzinlUCTQd7gc+MzW+oUL1/xeDLxlAsy55NA5t5INOv9Pgzw6jBi8wlBiCBUtRTWLjrBG8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781191596; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t8o/UGgityGJMHj76HO8iaVSRXTqkeYimX5nVorT8Ps=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=sD2hBX9mz/h9ViG0wSA/MGkToS/GwP4w9gP136imB8L5q3eXTOkP/Rs2fi/5F2/hdnTxiXH+GuszpgKFlHqYh+7Dm/IfpJKwre6JY7tGZP0XpXiKY/NxUOwrrwnxXprFj/UCdgQskCMu5vJ9VsCOwj4lJo2oBrkQDVtlq24LlMU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jwRq6ZWj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jwRq6ZWj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 414821F00899; Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:26:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781191595; bh=t8o/UGgityGJMHj76HO8iaVSRXTqkeYimX5nVorT8Ps=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=jwRq6ZWj/VLEqSLG+wXtgjJbRFSZ2OqciUOqqXBljPbUx++OwxhrCwF5HBpER8mR7 kg7dMQaMiOrN25riM3UZ8Ky0EokXYJ9RJJKoFmLF9bHznRWiJxBpzfbuE6NxZbz5OQ IlKmb4v8NKmun4Yj9tn38aRQN91WqUdU7P8i+lAanpRhItVn9XZQXrAv7wEHSVE8cg KODMQEmNWQr4jdJWcMBgDvcL5T6PI+jTYG4oCbOVIA8LG3v8VK2h2nfelA1Wd42vYV NPXVRA2v1KQwwO+nRXkWZgsO7Xjjj2oJJ2YgLdBtSso6K35GSc+SVefQgtbL/s1Hnf NnTYOG3yNjRvQ== From: Sasha Levin To: Salvatore Bonaccorso Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Minh Nguyen , Willem de Bruijn , Paolo Abeni , Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: Please apply 98d0912e9f84 ("net: skbuff: fix missing zerocopy reference in pskb_carve helpers") to 6.1.y Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:26:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20260611-stable-reply-0105@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 05:59:52AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I tested down to 6.1.y; the 6.6.y commit needs to be slightly > different. I have not tested 5.15/5.10 (no net_zcopy_get() in 5.10.y, > so more work there). Should I send an explicit 6.6.y patch, or will > you pick the change for 6.6.y and 6.1.y yourself? Your 6.1.y patch applies cleanly and looks correct. But I can't queue it on its own: 98d0912e9f84 isn't in 6.6.y yet, and I don't add a fix to an older tree while a newer one is missing it. So I'm holding the 6.1.y change until 6.6.y is sorted. Rather than have me hand-adapt the other trees, please send explicit per-branch backports: your 6.1 patch doesn't apply cleanly to 6.6.y -- Thanks, Sasha