From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: david@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Cc: balbirs@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org,
riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, sj@kernel.org,
ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_vma_mapped: revalidate and do proper check before return device-private pmd
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:15:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616091522.83765-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d48ef0d-1110-4a9d-adcb-f701a1ce2cfa@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 01:58:15PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>On 6/12/26 04:48, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:55:47PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>> On 5/12/26 16:35, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I tried to compress above logic like this, hope it could look cleaner.
Emm ... spelling out the present/migration/device-private cases makes
this easier to review, and avoids hiding future softleaf types behind
pmd_is_valid_softleaf(), IMHO.
So I'd prefer David's explicit version[1].
>>>>
>>>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_valid_softleaf(pmde)) {
>>>> unsigned long pfn;
>>>> bool is_migration = pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde);
>>>> bool for_migration = !!(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION);
>>>>
>>>> if (is_migration != for_migration)
>>>> return not_found(pvmw);
>>>>
>>>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>>>> pfn = pmd_pfn(pmde);
>>>> else
>>>> pfn = softleaf_to_pfn(softleaf_from_pmd(pmde));
>>>>
>>>> if (!check_pmd(pfn, pvmw))
>>>> return not_found(pvmw);
>>>> } else if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
>>>
>>> It's more compact, but not necessarily cleaner. In particular, I detest
>>> pmd_trans_huge(), we should phase it out.
>>>
>>> if (pmd_present(pmde) && !pmd_leaf(pmde)) {
>>> goto pte_table;
>>> } else if (pmd_present(pmde) || pmd_is_valid_softleaf(pmde))
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Might work as well. But once we add support for other softleaf types, we'll have
>>> to touch it again. So I'd rather just list what we actually expect.
>>>
>>
>> Hi, David
>
>Hi,
>
>>
>> I may not follow you. Just want to confirm whether you prefer this goes as a
>> fix first, or you prefer it goes as what you suggested here as a cleanup?
>
>I guess we should just do it properly when we're touching the code already.
+1 to that ;)
>Does that answer your question? Will you send a proper patch?
Copied the diff from [1] below, with a couple of tiny nits inline. Feel
free to grab any of this if it looks sane :)
---8<---
diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
index a4d52fdb3056..de6a255cc847 100644
--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
@@ -242,40 +242,28 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
*/
pmde = pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd);
- if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
- pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
- pmde = *pvmw->pmd;
- if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
- softleaf_t entry;
-
- if (!thp_migration_supported() ||
- !(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
- return not_found(pvmw);
- entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
-
- if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry) ||
- !check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
- return not_found(pvmw);
- return true;
- }
- if (likely(pmd_trans_huge(pmde))) {
- if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
- return not_found(pvmw);
- if (!check_pmd(pmd_pfn(pmde), pvmw))
- return not_found(pvmw);
- return true;
- }
- /* THP pmd was split under us: handle on pte level */
- spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
- pvmw->ptl = NULL;
- } else if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
- const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
-
- if (softleaf_is_device_private(entry)) {
- pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
- return true;
- }
+ if (pmd_present(pmde)) {
+ if (!pmd_leaf(pmde))
+ goto pte_table;
+ if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
+ return not_found(pvmw);
+ if (!check_pmd(pmd_pfn(pmde), pvmw))
+ return not_found(pvmw);
+ } else if (pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
+ softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
Could be const.
+
+ if (!(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
+ return not_found(pvmw);
+ if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
+ return not_found(pvmw);
+ } else if (pmd_is_device_private_entry(pmde)) {
+ softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
Ditto.
+ if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
+ return not_found(pvmw);
+ if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
+ return not_found(pvmw);
+ } else {
if ((pvmw->flags & PVMW_SYNC) &&
thp_vma_suitable_order(vma, pvmw->address,
PMD_ORDER) &&
@@ -285,6 +273,15 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
step_forward(pvmw, PMD_SIZE);
continue;
}
+
+ /* Double-check under PTL that the PMD didn't change. */
+ pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
+ if (pmd_same(pmde, pmdp_get(pvmw->pmd)))
Maybe worth a likely() here? The PMD normally shouldn't change under us.
+ return true;
+ spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
+ pvmw->ptl = NULL;
+ goto restart;
+pte_table:
if (!map_pte(pvmw, &pmde, &ptl)) {
if (!pvmw->pte)
---
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/0aab59b8-71c5-4059-8281-5dd876946528@kernel.org/
Cheers, Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 1:37 [PATCH] mm/page_vma_mapped: revalidate and do proper check before return device-private pmd Wei Yang
2026-05-08 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-10 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2026-05-08 22:48 ` Balbir Singh
2026-05-10 1:20 ` Wei Yang
2026-05-12 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 14:35 ` Wei Yang
2026-05-12 18:55 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 23:03 ` Balbir Singh
2026-05-12 23:14 ` Wei Yang
2026-05-12 23:19 ` Balbir Singh
2026-05-13 1:47 ` Balbir Singh
2026-06-12 2:48 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-15 11:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-16 3:02 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-16 9:15 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-06-16 9:27 ` Wei Yang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-22 13:06 Wei Yang
2026-06-22 13:14 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-22 13:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-22 14:21 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-22 14:59 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-22 16:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-22 23:45 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-23 17:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-24 2:09 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-22 14:44 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-23 16:18 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-24 3:13 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616091522.83765-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox