Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: david@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Cc: balbirs@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
	harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, sj@kernel.org,
	ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_vma_mapped: revalidate and do proper check before return device-private pmd
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:15:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616091522.83765-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d48ef0d-1110-4a9d-adcb-f701a1ce2cfa@kernel.org>


On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 01:58:15PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>On 6/12/26 04:48, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:55:47PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>> On 5/12/26 16:35, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I tried to compress above logic like this, hope it could look cleaner.

Emm ... spelling out the present/migration/device-private cases makes
this easier to review, and avoids hiding future softleaf types behind
pmd_is_valid_softleaf(), IMHO.

So I'd prefer David's explicit version[1].

>>>>
>>>> 	if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_valid_softleaf(pmde)) {
>>>> 		unsigned long pfn;
>>>> 		bool is_migration = pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde);
>>>> 		bool for_migration = !!(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION);
>>>>
>>>> 		if (is_migration != for_migration)
>>>> 			return not_found(pvmw);
>>>>
>>>> 		if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>>>> 			pfn = pmd_pfn(pmde);
>>>> 		else
>>>> 			pfn = softleaf_to_pfn(softleaf_from_pmd(pmde));
>>>>
>>>> 		if (!check_pmd(pfn, pvmw))
>>>> 			return not_found(pvmw);
>>>> 	} else if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
>>>
>>> It's more compact, but not necessarily cleaner. In particular, I detest
>>> pmd_trans_huge(), we should phase it out.
>>>
>>> if (pmd_present(pmde) && !pmd_leaf(pmde)) {
>>> 	goto pte_table;
>>> } else if (pmd_present(pmde) || pmd_is_valid_softleaf(pmde))
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Might work as well. But once we add support for other softleaf types, we'll have
>>> to touch it again. So I'd rather just list what we actually expect.
>>>
>> 
>> Hi, David
>
>Hi,
>
>> 
>> I may not follow you. Just want to confirm whether you prefer this goes as a
>> fix first, or you prefer it goes as what you suggested here as a cleanup?
>
>I guess we should just do it properly when we're touching the code already.

+1 to that ;)

>Does that answer your question? Will you send a proper patch?

Copied the diff from [1] below, with a couple of tiny nits inline. Feel
free to grab any of this if it looks sane :)

---8<---
diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
index a4d52fdb3056..de6a255cc847 100644
--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
@@ -242,40 +242,28 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
                 */
                pmde = pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd);
 
-               if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde) || pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
-                       pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
-                       pmde = *pvmw->pmd;
-                       if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
-                               softleaf_t entry;
-
-                               if (!thp_migration_supported() ||
-                                   !(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
-                                       return not_found(pvmw);
-                               entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
-
-                               if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry) ||
-                                   !check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
-                                       return not_found(pvmw);
-                               return true;
-                       }
-                       if (likely(pmd_trans_huge(pmde))) {
-                               if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
-                                       return not_found(pvmw);
-                               if (!check_pmd(pmd_pfn(pmde), pvmw))
-                                       return not_found(pvmw);
-                               return true;
-                       }
-                       /* THP pmd was split under us: handle on pte level */
-                       spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
-                       pvmw->ptl = NULL;
-               } else if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
-                       const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);
-
-                       if (softleaf_is_device_private(entry)) {
-                               pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
-                               return true;
-                       }
+               if (pmd_present(pmde)) {
+                       if (!pmd_leaf(pmde))
+                               goto pte_table;
+                       if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
+                               return not_found(pvmw);
+                       if (!check_pmd(pmd_pfn(pmde), pvmw))
+                               return not_found(pvmw);
+               } else if (pmd_is_migration_entry(pmde)) {
+                       softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);

Could be const.

+
+                       if (!(pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION))
+                               return not_found(pvmw);
+                       if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
+                               return not_found(pvmw);
+               } else if (pmd_is_device_private_entry(pmde)) {
+                       softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(pmde);

Ditto.
 
+                       if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_MIGRATION)
+                               return not_found(pvmw);
+                       if (!check_pmd(softleaf_to_pfn(entry), pvmw))
+                               return not_found(pvmw);
+               } else {
                        if ((pvmw->flags & PVMW_SYNC) &&
                            thp_vma_suitable_order(vma, pvmw->address,
                                                   PMD_ORDER) &&
@@ -285,6 +273,15 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
                        step_forward(pvmw, PMD_SIZE);
                        continue;
                }
+
+               /* Double-check under PTL that the PMD didn't change. */
+               pvmw->ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pvmw->pmd);
+               if (pmd_same(pmde, pmdp_get(pvmw->pmd)))

Maybe worth a likely() here? The PMD normally shouldn't change under us.

+                       return true;
+               spin_unlock(pvmw->ptl);
+               pvmw->ptl = NULL;
+               goto restart;
+pte_table:
                if (!map_pte(pvmw, &pmde, &ptl)) {
                        if (!pvmw->pte)
---

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/0aab59b8-71c5-4059-8281-5dd876946528@kernel.org/

Cheers, Lance

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08  1:37 [PATCH] mm/page_vma_mapped: revalidate and do proper check before return device-private pmd Wei Yang
2026-05-08 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-10  1:22   ` Wei Yang
2026-05-08 22:48 ` Balbir Singh
2026-05-10  1:20   ` Wei Yang
2026-05-12 12:43   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 14:35     ` Wei Yang
2026-05-12 18:55       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 23:03         ` Balbir Singh
2026-05-12 23:14           ` Wei Yang
2026-05-12 23:19             ` Balbir Singh
2026-05-13  1:47             ` Balbir Singh
2026-06-12  2:48         ` Wei Yang
2026-06-15 11:58           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-16  3:02             ` Wei Yang
2026-06-16  9:15             ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-06-16  9:27               ` Wei Yang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-22 13:06 Wei Yang
2026-06-22 13:14 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-22 13:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-22 14:21   ` Wei Yang
2026-06-22 14:59     ` Lance Yang
2026-06-22 16:11     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-22 23:45       ` Wei Yang
2026-06-23 17:02         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-24  2:09           ` Wei Yang
2026-06-22 14:44   ` Lance Yang
2026-06-23 16:18 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-24  3:13   ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616091522.83765-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox