Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: seanjc@google.com,pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:15:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070233-cytoplast-likewise-c9f6@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f1edbed787ba67988ed34e0132ca128b052b6ce8
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026070233-cytoplast-likewise-c9f6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' 'HEAD^..'

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From f1edbed787ba67988ed34e0132ca128b052b6ce8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 15:52:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd
 datamatch with get_unaligned()

Drop a BUG_ON() that has been reachable since it was first added, way back
in 2009, and instead use get_unaligned() to perform potentially-unaligned
accesses.

For a given store, KVM x86's emulator tracks the entire value in the
destination operand, x86_emulate_ctxt.dst.  If the destination is memory,
and the target splits multiple pages and/or is emulated MMIO, then KVM
handles each fragment independently.  E.g. on a page split starting at page
offset 0xffc, KVM writes 4 bytes to the first page, then the remaining
bytes to the second page, using ctxt->dst as the source for both (with
appropriate offsets).

If the destination splits a page *and* hits emulated MMIO on the second
page, then KVM will complete the write to the first page, then emulate the
MMIO access to the second page.  If there is a datamatch-enabled ioeventfd
at offset 0 of the second page, then KVM will process the remainder of the
store as a potential ioeventfd signal.

Putting it all together, if the guest emits a store that splits a page
starting at page offset N, and the second page has a datamatch-enabled
ioeventfd at offset 0, then KVM will check for datamatch using
&dst.valptr[N] as the source.  Due to dst (and thus dst.valptr) being
32-byte aligned, if N is not aligned to @len, the BUG_ON() fires.

E.g. with a 16-byte store at page offset 0xffc, to an ioeventfd of len 8,
all initial checks in ioeventfd_in_range() will succeed, and the BUG_ON()
fires due to @val being 4-byte aligned, but not 8-byte aligned.

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:783!
  Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 615 Comm: repro Not tainted 7.1.0-rc2-ff238429d1ea #365 PREEMPT
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  RIP: 0010:ioeventfd_write+0x6c/0x70 [kvm]
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __kvm_io_bus_write+0x85/0xb0 [kvm]
   kvm_io_bus_write+0x53/0x80 [kvm]
   vcpu_mmio_write+0x66/0xf0 [kvm]
   emulator_read_write_onepage+0x12a/0x540 [kvm]
   emulator_read_write+0x109/0x2b0 [kvm]
   x86_emulate_insn+0x4f8/0xfb0 [kvm]
   x86_emulate_instruction+0x181/0x790 [kvm]
   kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x313/0x630 [kvm]
   vmx_handle_exit+0x18a/0x590 [kvm_intel]
   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xc81/0x1c90 [kvm]
   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2d5/0x970 [kvm]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0
   do_syscall_64+0xb7/0x890
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
  RIP: 0033:0x7f19c931a9bf
   </TASK>
  Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass
  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

In a perfect world, the fix would be to simply delete the BUG_ON(), as KVM
x86 doesn't perform alignment checks on "normal" memory accesses at CPL0.
Sadly, C99 ruins all the fun; while the x86 architecture plays nice,
dereferencing an unaligned pointer directly is undefined behavior in C,
e.g. triggers splats when running with CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT=y.

Fixes: d34e6b175e61 ("KVM: add ioeventfd support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20260612225241.678509-1-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 0e8b8a2c5b79..93ad2ebc963f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
 #include <linux/irqbypass.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned.h>
 #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
 
 #include <kvm/iodev.h>
@@ -779,21 +780,18 @@ ioeventfd_in_range(struct _ioeventfd *p, gpa_t addr, int len, const void *val)
 		return true;
 
 	/* otherwise, we have to actually compare the data */
-
-	BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)val, len));
-
 	switch (len) {
 	case 1:
-		_val = *(u8 *)val;
+		_val = get_unaligned((u8 *)val);
 		break;
 	case 2:
-		_val = *(u16 *)val;
+		_val = get_unaligned((u16 *)val);
 		break;
 	case 4:
-		_val = *(u32 *)val;
+		_val = get_unaligned((u32 *)val);
 		break;
 	case 8:
-		_val = *(u64 *)val;
+		_val = get_unaligned((u64 *)val);
 		break;
 	default:
 		return false;


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02 13:15 gregkh [this message]
2026-07-04 11:53 ` [PATCH 5.15.y] KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026070233-cytoplast-likewise-c9f6@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox