From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y] ACPI: CPPC: Suppress UBSAN warning caused by field misuse
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:30:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710133016.79831-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026070952-veto-gradually-3869@gregkh>
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
[ Upstream commit 1b1acf2dada0cc3931bb2cb9ff8832edfbee46a1 ]
The definition of reg->access_width changes depending on the
reg->space_id type. Type ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM uses
access_width to indicate the PCC region, which can result in a UBSAN
if the value is greater than 4.
For example:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1090:9
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
CPU: 61 UID: 0 PID: 1220 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 7.0.10-201.fc44.aarch64 #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M.
Call trace:
...(trimming)
ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x48
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0xdc/0x1e0
cpc_write+0x4d0/0x670
cppc_set_perf+0x18c/0x490
cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x1c8/0x380 [cppc_cpufreq]
... (trimming)
Lets fix this by validating the region type, as well as whether
access_width has a value. Then since we are returning bit_width
directly for ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM, drop the code correcting
the size.
Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Easwar Hariharan <easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260601235808.1113137-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index f86e68863a24ae..30c8799b1a6a8f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -161,8 +161,13 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, nominal_freq);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, reference_perf);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
-/* Check for valid access_width, otherwise, fallback to using bit_width */
-#define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) ((reg)->access_width ? (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
+/*
+ * PCC reuses the access_width field as the subspace id, so only decode access
+ * size for non-PCC registers. Otherwise, use the bit_width.
+ */
+#define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) (((reg)->access_width && \
+ (reg)->space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM) ? \
+ (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
/* Shift and apply the mask for CPC reads/writes */
#define MASK_VAL_READ(reg, val) (((val) >> (reg)->bit_offset) & \
@@ -970,7 +975,6 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
* by the bit width field; the access size is used to indicate
* the PCC subspace id.
*/
- size = reg->bit_width;
vaddr = GET_PCC_VADDR(reg->address, pcc_ss_id);
}
else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
@@ -1030,7 +1034,6 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
* by the bit width field; the access size is used to indicate
* the PCC subspace id.
*/
- size = reg->bit_width;
vaddr = GET_PCC_VADDR(reg->address, pcc_ss_id);
}
else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 17:34 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: CPPC: Suppress UBSAN warning caused by field misuse" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-10 13:30 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710133016.79831-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox