From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn,james.clark@linaro.org,suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] coresight: etb10: restore atomic_t for shared reading state" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:36:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026071323-clinking-armband-5963@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x fa09f08ede3db3050ae16ae1ed92c902d0cada23
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026071323-clinking-armband-5963@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From fa09f08ede3db3050ae16ae1ed92c902d0cada23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 00:52:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] coresight: etb10: restore atomic_t for shared reading state
The etb10 miscdevice uses drvdata->reading as a shared exclusivity gate
for userspace buffer access. etb_open() claims that gate with
local_cmpxchg(), and etb_release() clears it with local_set().
That gate is shared per-device state rather than CPU-local state. A
running system can reach it whenever /dev/<etb> is opened, closed, and
reopened by different tasks while the device remains registered, so the
same drvdata->reading variable may be claimed on one CPU and later
cleared on another.
This code used to use atomic_t for the same gate, but commit
27b10da8fff2 ("coresight: etb10: moving to local atomic operations")
changed it to local_t even though the access pattern remained cross-task
and cross-CPU. Restore atomic_t together with atomic_cmpxchg() and
atomic_set() so the exclusivity gate again uses a primitive intended
for shared state.
The issue was found on Linux v6.18.21 by our static analysis tool while
scanning surviving local_t-on-shared-state sites, and then manually
reviewed against the live etb10 file-op path.
It was runtime-validated with a reproducible QEMU no-device KCSAN PoC
that kept the same report-local contract:
1. use one shared struct etb_drvdata carrier and its
drvdata->reading gate;
2. call etb_open() and etb_release() sequentially on that gate to
confirm the original claim/clear path;
3. bind the open side to CPU0 and the release side to CPU1 for the
same gate to show cross-CPU ownership;
4. run bound workers that repeatedly race etb_open() and
etb_release() on the same gate until KCSAN reports a target hit.
The harness recorded:
L1 passed open=1 release=1
reading_after_open=1 reading_after_release=0
L2 passed open_cpu=0 release_cpu=1
cross_cpu_release=1 reading_after=0 open_ret=0
Representative KCSAN excerpt from the no-device validation run:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in etb_open.constprop.0.isra.0 [vuln_msv]
write to 0xffffffffc0003810 of 4 bytes by task 216 on cpu 1:
etb_open.constprop.0.isra.0+0x38/0x80 [vuln_msv]
l3_worker_thread_fn+0x4f/0xf0 [vuln_msv]
kthread+0x17e/0x1c0
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
read to 0xffffffffc0003810 of 4 bytes by task 215 on cpu 0:
etb_open.constprop.0.isra.0+0x18/0x80 [vuln_msv]
l3_worker_thread_fn+0x4f/0xf0 [vuln_msv]
kthread+0x17e/0x1c0
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0x00000001
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 0 PID: 215 Comm: etb10_l3_a Tainted: G O 6.1.66 #2
This no-device harness is not a real ETB10 hardware end-to-end run, but
it preserves the same shared drvdata->reading gate and the same
etb_open()/etb_release() claim/clear contract. No real ETB10 hardware
was available for runtime testing.
Build-tested with:
make olddefconfig
make -j"$(nproc)" drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.o
Fixes: 27b10da8fff2 ("coresight: etb10: moving to local atomic operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260528165201.319452-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
index b952a1d47f12..a827f76b8144 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct etb_drvdata {
struct coresight_device *csdev;
struct miscdevice miscdev;
raw_spinlock_t spinlock;
- local_t reading;
+ atomic_t reading;
pid_t pid;
u8 *buf;
u32 buffer_depth;
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static int etb_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
struct etb_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(file->private_data,
struct etb_drvdata, miscdev);
- if (local_cmpxchg(&drvdata->reading, 0, 1))
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(&drvdata->reading, 0, 1))
return -EBUSY;
dev_dbg(&drvdata->csdev->dev, "%s: successfully opened\n", __func__);
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ static int etb_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct etb_drvdata *drvdata = container_of(file->private_data,
struct etb_drvdata, miscdev);
- local_set(&drvdata->reading, 0);
+ atomic_set(&drvdata->reading, 0);
dev_dbg(&drvdata->csdev->dev, "%s: released\n", __func__);
return 0;
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 13:36 gregkh [this message]
2026-07-15 11:40 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] coresight: etb10: restore atomic_t for shared reading state Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026071323-clinking-armband-5963@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox