Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18.y 2/4] btrfs: replace for_each_set_bit() with for_each_set_bitmap()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:01:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720150109.1921272-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720150109.1921272-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit e6698b34fab33867ef3faeeea6feb165f31aae24 ]

Inside extent_io.c, there are several simple call sites doing things
like:

	for_each_set_bit(bit, bitmap, bitmap_size) {
		/* handle one fs block */
	}

The workload includes:

- set_bit()
  Inside extent_writepage_io().

  This can be replaced with a bitmap_set().

- btrfs_folio_set_lock()
- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()
  Inside writepage_delalloc().

  Instead of calling it multiple times, we can pass a range into the
  function with one call.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 66ff4d366e7e ("btrfs: fix false IO failure after falling back to buffered write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index b8e2b605d52c1e..88b5581df7dc16 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1427,8 +1427,9 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 	u64 delalloc_start = page_start;
 	u64 delalloc_end = page_end;
 	u64 delalloc_to_write = 0;
+	unsigned int start_bit;
+	unsigned int end_bit;
 	int ret = 0;
-	int bit;
 
 	/* Save the dirty bitmap as our submission bitmap will be a subset of it. */
 	if (btrfs_is_subpage(fs_info, folio)) {
@@ -1438,10 +1439,12 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 		bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap = 1;
 	}
 
-	for_each_set_bit(bit, &bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, blocks_per_folio) {
-		u64 start = page_start + (bit << fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
+	for_each_set_bitrange(start_bit, end_bit, &bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap,
+			      blocks_per_folio) {
+		u64 start = page_start + (start_bit << fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
+		u32 len = (end_bit - start_bit) << fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 
-		btrfs_folio_set_lock(fs_info, folio, start, fs_info->sectorsize);
+		btrfs_folio_set_lock(fs_info, folio, start, len);
 	}
 
 	/* Lock all (subpage) delalloc ranges inside the folio first. */
@@ -1558,10 +1561,13 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 				fs_info->sectorsize_bits,
 				blocks_per_folio);
 
-		for_each_set_bit(bit, &bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, bitmap_size)
-			btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(inode, folio,
-				page_start + (bit << fs_info->sectorsize_bits),
-				fs_info->sectorsize, false);
+		for_each_set_bitrange(start_bit, end_bit, &bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap,
+				      bitmap_size) {
+			u64 start = page_start + (start_bit << fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
+			u32 len = (end_bit - start_bit) << fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
+
+			btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(inode, folio, start, len, false);
+		}
 		return ret;
 	}
 out:
@@ -1727,8 +1733,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack int extent_writepage_io(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	for (cur = start; cur < end; cur += fs_info->sectorsize)
-		set_bit((cur - folio_start) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits, &range_bitmap);
+	bitmap_set(&range_bitmap, (start - folio_pos(folio)) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits,
+		   len >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits);
 	bitmap_and(&bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, &bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, &range_bitmap,
 		   blocks_per_folio);
 
-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 10:11 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix false IO failure after falling back to buffered" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-20 15:01 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/4] btrfs: concentrate the error handling of submit_one_sector() Sasha Levin
2026-07-20 15:01   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-07-20 15:01   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 3/4] btrfs: remove folio parameter from ordered io related functions Sasha Levin
2026-07-20 15:01   ` [PATCH 6.18.y 4/4] btrfs: fix false IO failure after falling back to buffered write Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720150109.1921272-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox