From: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net/packet: defer vmalloc TX_RING free until skbs finish
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:58:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721015824.45829-1-kylebot@openai.com> (raw)
AF_PACKET TX_RING skbs keep a raw pointer to their ring frame. The skb
page references preserve page-backed ring blocks after pg_vec is freed,
but they do not preserve a vmalloc mapping.
tpacket_destruct_skb() currently drops the pending reference before
writing the timestamp and TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE to the frame. Move the
decrement after those stores. The smp_wmb() in __packet_set_status()
orders the frame stores before the decrement.
On socket close, scan every pg_vec entry because allocation can produce
a mixture of page-backed and vmalloc-backed blocks. If any block is
vmalloc-backed and TX skbs remain pending, defer the whole vector to
system_long_wq.
After pg_vec is detached, a late destructor can skip the pending
decrement. Use socket write-memory accounting as the deferred lifetime
gate instead: an skb remains charged through its final sock_wfree(),
after all ring-frame accesses. The delayed work retains a socket
reference and reschedules itself until no TX skbs remain. Fall back to
a synchronous wait if the work allocation fails.
Move pending_refcnt release to packet_sock_destruct() so late skb
destructors and deferred cleanup can safely use it after
packet_release(). Page-backed teardown remains synchronous, and no lock
is added to the TX completion hot path.
Fixes: b013840810c2 ("packet: use percpu mmap tx frame pending refcount")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6
Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 8e6f3a734ba0..1a4c548c59ac 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
#include <linux/errqueue.h>
#include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
#include <net/inet_common.h>
#endif
@@ -1329,6 +1330,8 @@ static void packet_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc));
WARN_ON(refcount_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
+ packet_free_pending(pkt_sk(sk));
+
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
pr_err("Attempt to release alive packet socket: %p\n", sk);
return;
@@ -2516,14 +2519,12 @@ static void tpacket_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
__u32 ts;
ph = skb_zcopy_get_nouarg(skb);
- packet_dec_pending(&po->tx_ring);
ts = __packet_set_timestamp(po, ph, skb);
__packet_set_status(po, ph, TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE | ts);
-
+ packet_dec_pending(&po->tx_ring);
complete(&po->skb_completion);
}
-
sock_wfree(skb);
}
@@ -3182,7 +3183,6 @@ static int packet_release(struct socket *sock)
/* Purge queues */
skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
- packet_free_pending(po);
sock_put(sk);
return 0;
@@ -4345,8 +4345,16 @@ static const struct vm_operations_struct packet_mmap_ops = {
.close = packet_mm_close,
};
-static void free_pg_vec(struct pgv *pg_vec, unsigned int order,
- unsigned int len)
+struct packet_pg_vec_free {
+ struct delayed_work work;
+ struct sock *sk;
+ struct pgv *pg_vec;
+ unsigned int order;
+ unsigned int len;
+};
+
+static void __free_pg_vec(struct pgv *pg_vec, unsigned int order,
+ unsigned int len)
{
int i;
@@ -4363,6 +4371,69 @@ static void free_pg_vec(struct pgv *pg_vec, unsigned int order,
kfree(pg_vec);
}
+static void packet_wait_for_tx_skbs(struct packet_sock *po)
+{
+ while (sk_wmem_alloc_get(&po->sk))
+ wait_for_completion_timeout(&po->skb_completion, 1);
+}
+
+static void packet_free_pg_vec_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct packet_pg_vec_free *deferred;
+ struct sock *sk;
+
+ deferred = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
+ struct packet_pg_vec_free, work);
+ sk = deferred->sk;
+ if (sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk)) {
+ queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &deferred->work, 1);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ __free_pg_vec(deferred->pg_vec, deferred->order, deferred->len);
+ kfree(deferred);
+ sock_put(sk);
+}
+
+static bool pg_vec_has_vmalloc(struct pgv *pg_vec, unsigned int len)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ if (pg_vec[i].buffer && is_vmalloc_addr(pg_vec[i].buffer))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void free_pg_vec(struct packet_sock *po, struct pgv *pg_vec,
+ unsigned int order, unsigned int len)
+{
+ struct packet_pg_vec_free *deferred;
+
+ if (!pg_vec_has_vmalloc(pg_vec, len) ||
+ !packet_read_pending(&po->tx_ring)) {
+ __free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, len);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ deferred = kmalloc(sizeof(*deferred), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!deferred) {
+ packet_wait_for_tx_skbs(po);
+ __free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, len);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&deferred->work, packet_free_pg_vec_work);
+ deferred->sk = &po->sk;
+ deferred->pg_vec = pg_vec;
+ deferred->order = order;
+ deferred->len = len;
+
+ sock_hold(deferred->sk);
+ queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &deferred->work, 0);
+}
+
static char *alloc_one_pg_vec_page(unsigned long order)
{
char *buffer;
@@ -4408,7 +4479,7 @@ static struct pgv *alloc_pg_vec(struct tpacket_req *req, int order)
return pg_vec;
out_free_pgvec:
- free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, block_nr);
+ __free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, block_nr);
pg_vec = NULL;
goto out;
}
@@ -4574,7 +4645,10 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
out_free_pg_vec:
if (pg_vec) {
bitmap_free(rx_owner_map);
- free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, req->tp_block_nr);
+ if (tx_ring && closing)
+ free_pg_vec(po, pg_vec, order, req->tp_block_nr);
+ else
+ __free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, req->tp_block_nr);
}
out:
return err;
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 1:58 Kyle Zeng [this message]
2026-07-21 7:26 ` [PATCH net] net/packet: defer vmalloc TX_RING free until skbs finish Eric Dumazet
2026-07-21 7:57 ` Willem de Bruijn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-21 1:56 Kyle Zeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721015824.45829-1-kylebot@openai.com \
--to=kylebot@openai.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox